Pozorski v. Trucks, Trailers & More ( 2023 )


Menu:
  •                                                                                 FILED
    IN THE OFFICE OF THE
    CLERK OF SUPREME COURT
    MARCH 31, 2023
    STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
    IN THE SUPREME COURT
    STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
    
    2023 ND 54
    Kurt and Jackie Pozorski,                            Plaintiffs and Appellants
    v.
    Trucks, Trailers & More, Inc.
    and Cody Fleck,                                     Defendants and Appellees
    No. 20220267
    Appeal from the District Court of Morton County, South Central Judicial
    District, the Honorable Douglas A. Bahr, Judge.
    AFFIRMED.
    Per Curiam.
    Garrett D. Ludwig, Mandan, ND, for defendants and appellees.
    Christopher A. Wills, St Cloud, MN, for plaintiffs and appellants.
    Pozorski, et al. v. Trucks, Trailers & More, et al.
    No. 20220267
    Per Curiam.
    [¶1] Kurt and Jackie Pozorski (“the Pozorskis”) appeal from a district court
    judgment dismissing their claims against Trucks, Trailers & More, Inc. and
    Cody Fleck (collectively “TTM”). On appeal, the Pozorskis argue the district
    court abused its discretion by issuing sanctions for spoliation of evidence. The
    Pozorskis also argue the court erred by finding they failed to provide sufficient
    notice of repair of a truck they purchased from TTM. Finally, they argue the
    court erred by finding TTM established prejudice.
    [¶2] A court’s decision to exercise its inherent power to sanction when
    relevant evidence is destroyed or spoiled will only be reversed on appeal if the
    court abused its discretion. Fines v. Ressler Enters., Inc., 
    2012 ND 175
    , ¶ 7, 
    820 N.W.2d 688
    . Whether a party had notice is a finding of fact subject to the clearly
    erroneous standard of review. Desert Partners IV, L.P. v. Benson, 
    2019 ND 19
    ,
    ¶ 14, 
    921 N.W.2d 444
    . Findings of prejudice are reviewed under the clearly
    erroneous standard of review. Hunter v. State, 
    2020 ND 224
    , ¶ 16, 
    949 N.W.2d 841
    . We conclude the district court’s findings are not clearly erroneous and it
    did not abuse its discretion. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P.
    35.1(a)(2) and (4).
    [¶3] Jon J. Jensen, C.J.
    Lisa Fair McEvers
    Jerod E. Tufte
    David W. Nelson, S.J.
    Stacy J. Louser, D.J.
    [¶4] The Honorable David W. Nelson, S.J., and the Honorable Stacy J. Louser,
    D.J., sitting in place of Crothers, J., and Bahr, J., disqualified.
    1
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 20220267

Judges: Per Curiam

Filed Date: 3/31/2023

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 3/31/2023