Moncada v. State , 2022 ND 80 ( 2022 )


Menu:
  •                                                                               FILED
    IN THE OFFICE OF THE
    CLERK OF SUPREME COURT
    APRIL 14, 2022
    STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
    IN THE SUPREME COURT
    STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
    
    2022 ND 80
    Joseph Daniel Moncada,                             Petitioner and Appellant
    v.
    State of North Dakota,                             Respondent and Appellee
    No. 20210338
    Appeal from the District Court of Grand Forks County, Northeast Central
    Judicial District, the Honorable John A. Thelen, Judge.
    AFFIRMED.
    Per Curiam.
    Laura C. Ringsak, Bismarck, N.D., for petitioner and appellant; submitted on
    brief.
    Carmell F. Mattison, Assistant State’s Attorney, Grand Forks, N.D., for
    respondent and appellee; submitted on brief.
    Moncada v. State
    No. 20210338
    Per Curiam.
    [¶1] Joseph Moncada appeals from an order summarily dismissing his
    application for postconviction relief. In 2009, Moncada was found guilty of two
    counts of murder and two counts of conspiracy to commit murder. On
    September 14, 2021, Moncada filed a motion the court treated as an application
    for postconviction relief. Because the application was filed more than two years
    after his conviction became final, he must establish an exception under
    N.D.C.C. § 29-32.1-01(3) to avoid dismissal for untimeliness. Moncada argues
    the new interpretation of state law exception is satisfied by our decision in
    State v. Swanson, 
    2019 ND 181
    , 
    930 N.W.2d 645
    , declaring conspiracy to
    commit a “knowing” murder as a non-cognizable offense. Moncada requests his
    conspiracy to commit murder charges be vacated. Swanson was published on
    July 11, 2019. Therefore, we conclude the district court properly dismissed his
    application as untimely because Moncada did not file his application for
    postconviction relief within two years of the effective date of Swanson. See Hieb
    v. State, 
    2016 ND 146
    , ¶ 13, 
    882 N.W.2d 724
     (denying relief because petitioner
    did not file his application within two years of the effective date of this Court’s
    decision in State v. Borner, 
    2013 ND 141
    , 
    836 N.W.2d 383
    , declaring conspiracy
    to commit extreme indifference murder is a non-cognizable offense). We
    summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(7).
    [¶2] Jon J. Jensen, C.J.
    Gerald W. VandeWalle
    Daniel J. Crothers
    Lisa Fair McEvers
    Jerod E. Tufte
    1
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 20210338

Citation Numbers: 2022 ND 80

Judges: Per Curiam

Filed Date: 4/14/2022

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 4/14/2022