Dixon v. Dixon , 2022 ND 90 ( 2022 )


Menu:
  •                                                                               FILED
    IN THE OFFICE OF THE
    CLERK OF SUPREME COURT
    APRIL 28, 2022
    STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
    IN THE SUPREME COURT
    STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
    
    2022 ND 90
    John W. Dixon,                                      Petitioner and Appellant
    v.
    Billie Dixon,                                       Respondent and Appellee
    No. 20210294
    Appeal from the District Court of Burleigh County, South Central Judicial
    District, the Honorable Daniel J. Borgen, Judge.
    AFFIRMED.
    Per Curiam.
    Greg W. Hennessy, Williston, ND, for petitioner and appellant.
    Billie Dixon, Grand Forks, ND, respondent and appellee.
    Dixon v. Dixon
    No. 20210294
    Per Curiam.
    [¶1] John Dixon appeals after the district court entered an order discharging
    Billie Dixon as trustee of the Shirley A. Dixon Trust, closing the Trust, and
    concluding the court’s supervised administration of the Trust. John Dixon
    argues the court erred in concluding as a matter of law that there was no
    breach of fiduciary duty by trustee Billie Dixon for failing to provide annual
    accountings to him, as required by the Trust agreement and contrary to our
    prior decision in Dixon v. Dixon, 
    2018 ND 25
    , 
    905 N.W.2d 748
    . He further
    argues trustee Billie Dixon owes the beneficiaries reimbursement for waste of
    the trust funds.
    [¶2] After an August 2019 bench trial, the district court made findings of fact
    and conclusions of law. “When analyzing findings of fact and conclusions of law,
    we look to substance rather than labels given by the district court[.]” Larsen v.
    Comm’n on Med. Competency, 
    1998 ND 193
    , ¶ 17, 
    585 N.W.2d 801
    . The court
    found Billie Dixon complied with the Trust’s terms to provide an accounting
    and did not engage in improper conduct as trustee. The court also found she
    did not misuse trust assets or make improper gifts of trust property. On the
    basis of the evidence at trial, the court found Billie Dixon had provided all of
    the necessary accounting records and no funds were misappropriated, which
    are questions of fact. After our review of the record, we conclude the court’s
    findings of fact are not clearly erroneous and summarily affirm under
    N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2).
    [¶3] Jon J. Jensen, C.J.
    Gerald W. VandeWalle
    Daniel J. Crothers
    Lisa Fair McEvers
    Jerod E. Tufte
    1
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 20210294

Citation Numbers: 2022 ND 90

Judges: Per Curiam

Filed Date: 4/28/2022

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 4/28/2022