State ex rel. Counsel for Dis. v. Nowak ( 2021 )


Menu:
  • Nebraska Supreme Court Online Library
    www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/
    03/12/2021 08:10 AM CST
    - 249 -
    Nebraska Supreme Court Advance Sheets
    308 Nebraska Reports
    STATE EX REL. COUNSEL FOR DIS. v. NOWAK
    Cite as 
    308 Neb. 249
    State of Nebraska ex rel. Counsel for Discipline
    of the Nebraska Supreme Court, relator,
    v. Lauren Marie Nowak, respondent.
    ___ N.W.2d ___
    Filed January 22, 2021.   No. S-20-480.
    Original action. Judgment of public reprimand.
    Heavican, C.J., Miller-Lerman, Cassel, Stacy, Funke,
    Papik, and Freudenberg, JJ.
    Per Curiam.
    INTRODUCTION
    This case is before the court on the conditional admission
    filed by Lauren Marie Nowak, the respondent, on November
    25, 2020. The court accepts the respondent’s conditional
    admission and enters an order of public reprimand and 2 years
    of probation.
    FACTS
    The respondent was admitted to the practice of law in the
    State of Nebraska on October 25, 2011. She is currently on
    inactive status.
    On July 2, 2020, the Counsel for Discipline of the Nebraska
    Supreme Court, the relator, filed formal charges against the
    respondent. The formal charges consisted of one count against
    the respondent. Pursuant to Neb. Ct. R. § 3-302, the respondent
    is under the jurisdiction of the Committee on Inquiry of the
    Third Judicial District (Committee).
    - 250 -
    Nebraska Supreme Court Advance Sheets
    308 Nebraska Reports
    STATE EX REL. COUNSEL FOR DIS. v. NOWAK
    Cite as 
    308 Neb. 249
    The matters alleged in the formal charges were reviewed by
    the Committee pursuant to Neb. Ct. R. § 3-309(H) (rev. 2011).
    The Committee determined that there are reasonable grounds
    for discipline of the respondent and that a public interest would
    be served by the filing of formal charges.
    The formal charges generally allege violations stemming
    from the respondent’s being arrested in June 2018 and charged
    with one count of shoplifting (Class II misdemeanor) and
    one count of possession of a controlled substance (Class IV
    felony). On December 4, the respondent ultimately entered a
    plea of no contest to the amended charge of attempted posses-
    sion of a controlled substance, a Class I misdemeanor. She was
    sentenced to 1 year of probation. She was granted early release
    from probation after 6 months. The formal charges also state
    that the respondent was previously convicted of a shoplifting
    charge in 2017, for which she was fined $200.
    The formal charges allege that by her actions, the respondent
    violated her oath of office as an attorney licensed to practice
    law in the State of Nebraska as provided by 
    Neb. Rev. Stat. § 7-104
     (Reissue 2012) and violated Neb. Ct. R. of Prof. Cond.
    § 3-508.4(a) and (b) (misconduct).
    On November 25, 2020, the respondent filed a conditional
    admission pursuant to Neb. Ct. R. § 3-313(B) of the discipli­
    nary rules, in which she conditionally admitted that she vio-
    lated her oath of office as an attorney and § 3-508.4(a) and (b)
    of the professional conduct rules. In the conditional admission,
    the respondent admits that her conduct violated the identified
    rules of professional conduct. The respondent knowingly does
    not challenge or contest the truth of the matters conditionally
    asserted and waived all proceedings against her in exchange
    for a public reprimand and probation for a period of 2 years.
    During her probationary period, the respondent states she
    shall abide by the terms of her monitoring agreement with
    the Nebraska Lawyers Assistance Program, will not violate
    any laws of the State of Nebraska and/or any ordinances
    - 251 -
    Nebraska Supreme Court Advance Sheets
    308 Nebraska Reports
    STATE EX REL. COUNSEL FOR DIS. v. NOWAK
    Cite as 
    308 Neb. 249
    of any jurisdiction therein, and will not violate any of the
    Nebraska Rules of Professional Conduct.
    The proposed conditional admission included a declaration
    by the Counsel for Discipline, stating that the respondent’s pro-
    posed discipline is appropriate in light of the fact that the con-
    duct did not arise out of her duties as an attorney, the conduct
    did not involve clients, and the respondent is actively working
    on the personal behaviors that led to the charges.
    ANALYSIS
    Section 3-313, which is a component of our rules governing
    procedures regarding attorney discipline, provides in perti-
    nent part:
    (B) At any time after the Clerk has entered a Formal
    Charge against a Respondent on the docket of the Court,
    the Respondent may file with the Clerk a conditional
    admission of the Formal Charge in exchange for a stated
    form of consent judgment of discipline as to all or part of
    the Formal Charge pending against him or her as deter-
    mined to be appropriate by the Counsel for Discipline
    or any member appointed to prosecute on behalf of the
    Counsel for Discipline; such conditional admission is
    subject to approval by the Court. The conditional admis-
    sion shall include a written statement that the Respondent
    knowingly admits or knowingly does not challenge or
    contest the truth of the matter or matters conditionally
    admitted and waives all proceedings against him or her in
    connection therewith. If a tendered conditional admission
    is not finally approved as above provided, it may not be
    used as evidence against the Respondent in any way.
    Pursuant to § 3-313, and given the conditional admission,
    we find that the respondent knowingly does not challenge or
    contest the matters conditionally admitted. We further deter-
    mine that by her conduct, the respondent violated § 3-508.4(a)
    and (b) (misconduct) of the professional conduct rules and her
    oath of office as an attorney licensed to practice law in the
    - 252 -
    Nebraska Supreme Court Advance Sheets
    308 Nebraska Reports
    STATE EX REL. COUNSEL FOR DIS. v. NOWAK
    Cite as 
    308 Neb. 249
    State of Nebraska. The respondent has waived all additional
    proceedings against her in connection herewith. Upon due con-
    sideration, the court approves the conditional admission and
    enters the orders as indicated below.
    CONCLUSION
    The respondent is publicly reprimanded. Additionally, the
    respondent is to be on probation for a period of 2 years, dur-
    ing which time she will abide by the terms of her monitoring
    agreement with the Nebraska Lawyers Assistance Program and
    the terms outlined in her conditional admission. If the respond­
    ent applies to appear pro hac vice, she must disclose this disci-
    pline. The respondent is directed to pay costs and expenses in
    accordance with Neb. Ct. R. §§ 3-310(P) (rev. 2019) and 3-323
    of the disciplinary rules within 60 days after an order imposing
    costs and expenses, if any, is entered by the court.
    Judgment of public reprimand.
    

Document Info

Docket Number: S-20-480

Filed Date: 1/22/2021

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 3/12/2021