State v. St. Cyr ( 2018 )


Menu:
  • Nebraska Supreme Court Online Library
    www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/
    07/10/2018 12:11 AM CDT
    - 61 -
    Nebraska Court of A ppeals A dvance Sheets
    26 Nebraska A ppellate R eports
    STATE v. ST. CYR
    Cite as 
    26 Neb. Ct. App. 61
    State of Nebraska, appellee, v.
    Luke A. St. Cyr, appellant.
    ___ N.W.2d ___
    Filed July 3, 2018.     No. A-17-372.
    1.	 Sentences: Appeal and Error. An appellate court will not disturb a sen-
    tence imposed within the statutory limits absent an abuse of discretion
    by the trial court.
    2.	 Effectiveness of Counsel: Appeal and Error. Whether a claim of inef-
    fective assistance of trial counsel may be determined on direct appeal is
    a question of law.
    3.	 ____: ____. In reviewing claims of ineffective assistance of counsel on
    direct appeal, an appellate court decides only questions of law: Are the
    undisputed facts contained within the record sufficient to conclusively
    determine whether counsel did or did not provide effective assistance
    and whether the defendant was or was not prejudiced by counsel’s
    alleged deficient performance?
    4.	 Sentences: Appeal and Error. Where a sentence imposed within the
    statutory limits is alleged on appeal to be excessive, the appellate court
    must determine whether the sentencing court abused its discretion in
    considering and applying the relevant factors as well as any applicable
    legal principles in determining the sentence to be imposed.
    5.	 Sentences. When imposing a sentence, the sentencing judge should
    consider the defendant’s (1) age, (2) mentality, (3) education and expe-
    rience, (4) social and cultural background, (5) past criminal record or
    record of law-abiding conduct, and (6) motivation for the offense, as
    well as (7) the nature of the offense and (8) the violence involved in the
    commission of the offense.
    6.	 ____. The appropriateness of a sentence is necessarily a subjective judg-
    ment and includes the sentencing judge’s observation of the defendant’s
    demeanor and attitude and all the facts and circumstances surrounding
    the defendant’s life.
    - 62 -
    Nebraska Court of A ppeals A dvance Sheets
    26 Nebraska A ppellate R eports
    STATE v. ST. CYR
    Cite as 
    26 Neb. Ct. App. 61
    7.	 Criminal Law: Restitution: Damages. Neb. Rev. Stat. § 29-2280
    (Reissue 2016) vests trial courts with the authority to order restitu-
    tion for actual damages sustained by the victim of a crime for which a
    defend­ant is convicted.
    8.	 Sentences: Restitution: Damages. After the sentencing court deter-
    mines that a conviction warrants restitution, it then becomes the sentenc-
    ing court’s factfinding responsibility to determine the victim’s actual
    damages and the defendant’s ability to pay.
    9.	 Effectiveness of Counsel: Appeal and Error. When a defendant’s trial
    counsel is different from his or her counsel on direct appeal, the defend­
    ant must raise on direct appeal any issue of trial counsel’s ineffective
    performance which is known to the defendant or is apparent from the
    record. Otherwise, the issue will be procedurally barred.
    10.	 Effectiveness of Counsel: Proof. To prevail on a claim of ineffective
    assistance of counsel under Strickland v. Washington, 
    466 U.S. 668
    ,
    
    104 S. Ct. 2052
    , 
    80 L. Ed. 2d 674
    (1984), the defendant must show that
    counsel’s performance was deficient and that this deficient performance
    actually prejudiced his or her defense.
    11.	 Effectiveness of Counsel: Pleas: Proof. To show prejudice when the
    alleged ineffective assistance relates to the entry of a plea, the defendant
    must show that there is a reasonable probability that, but for counsel’s
    errors, he or she would not have entered the plea and would have
    insisted on going to trial.
    12.	 Effectiveness of Counsel: Proof. The two prongs of the ineffective
    assistance test under Strickland v. Washington, 
    466 U.S. 668
    , 
    104 S. Ct. 2052
    , 
    80 L. Ed. 2d 674
    (1984), deficient performance and prejudice,
    may be addressed in either order.
    13.	 Effectiveness of Counsel: Sentences. Neb. Rev. Stat. §§ 29-2261
    and 29-2204.03 (Reissue 2016) give the court the discretion to order
    further evaluations of the defendant prior to sentencing when it deems
    such evaluations necessary for determining the sentence to be imposed;
    neither statute provides that a defendant can or should request the
    evaluations. Trial counsel cannot be deficient for failing to request
    evaluations that the court itself could have ordered, but in its discretion
    deemed unnecessary.
    Appeal from the District Court for Madison County: James
    G. Kube, Judge. Affirmed in part, sentence of restitution
    vacated, and cause remanded with directions.
    Ryan J. Stover, of Stratton, DeLay, Doele, Carlson &
    Buettner, P.C., L.L.O., for appellant.
    - 63 -
    Nebraska Court of A ppeals A dvance Sheets
    26 Nebraska A ppellate R eports
    STATE v. ST. CYR
    Cite as 
    26 Neb. Ct. App. 61
    Douglas J. Peterson, Attorney General, and Kimberly A.
    Klein for appellee.
    Moore, Chief Judge, and Bishop and A rterburn, Judges.
    Bishop, Judge.
    I. INTRODUCTION
    Luke A. St. Cyr pled guilty to one count of first degree
    assault pursuant to Neb. Rev. Stat. § 28-308 (Reissue 2016),
    and the district court for Madison County sentenced him to 40
    to 50 years’ imprisonment and ordered him to pay $100,000
    in restitution. St. Cyr argues that his sentence is excessive
    and that his counsel was ineffective. For the following rea-
    sons, we affirm in part, but because we find the court did
    not meaningfully consider St. Cyr’s ability to pay restitution,
    we vacate the sentence of restitution and remand the cause
    with directions.
    II. BACKGROUND
    On December 13, 2016, the State filed an information charg-
    ing St. Cyr with first degree assault pursuant to § 28-308, a
    Class II felony. The offense was alleged to have occurred on
    October 28.
    On January 30, 2017, pursuant to a plea agreement, St. Cyr
    pled guilty to the charge in the information in exchange for the
    State’s agreement to not file additional charges arising from
    the incident. The factual basis was derived from statements by
    St. Cyr, his attorney, and the State. St. Cyr’s counsel said that
    after a “brief verbal altercation,” St. Cyr “punched the victim
    several times, knocked the victim out and then [St. Cyr] pro-
    ceeded to kick the victim several times in the head and cause
    serious bodily injury.” St. Cyr told the court that “I punched
    him and I kicked him and I assaulted him.” The State added
    that the police responded to a call at a bar in Norfolk, Madison
    County, Nebraska. They found the victim bleeding, unable to
    talk, and unable to get up. The victim was taken to a hospi-
    tal, and
    - 64 -
    Nebraska Court of A ppeals A dvance Sheets
    26 Nebraska A ppellate R eports
    STATE v. ST. CYR
    Cite as 
    26 Neb. Ct. App. 61
    the doctors that continued to treat the victim would have
    indicated and testified that the injuries sustained by the
    victim fit the definition of serious bodily injury because
    there was a substantial risk from the injuries that . . . the
    victim may have died and it required . . . medical inter-
    vention to keep him alive.
    The State said there was a videotape, and the evidence would
    show that the victim did nothing wrong and that there was
    nothing that would justify the use of force against the victim.
    The district court accepted St. Cyr’s guilty plea to the infor-
    mation and later sentenced him to 40 to 50 years’ imprison-
    ment, with 111 days’ credit for time served. The court also
    ordered him to pay restitution in the amount of $100,000.
    St. Cyr appeals.
    III. ASSIGNMENTS OF ERROR
    St. Cyr assigns as error that (1) the district court imposed an
    excessive sentence both in the length of incarceration ordered
    and by ordering him to pay restitution without considering
    his ability to pay and (2) he received ineffective assistance
    of counsel.
    IV. STANDARD OF REVIEW
    [1] An appellate court will not disturb a sentence imposed
    within the statutory limits absent an abuse of discretion by the
    trial court. State v. Dyer, 
    298 Neb. 82
    , 
    902 N.W.2d 687
    (2017).
    A judicial abuse of discretion exists when the reasons or rul-
    ings of a trial judge are clearly untenable, unfairly depriving a
    litigant of a substantial right and denying just results in matters
    submitted for disposition. 
    Id. [2,3] Whether
    a claim of ineffective assistance of trial
    counsel may be determined on direct appeal is a question of
    law. State v. Loding, 
    296 Neb. 670
    , 
    895 N.W.2d 669
    (2017).
    In reviewing claims of ineffective assistance of counsel on
    direct appeal, an appellate court decides only questions of
    law: Are the undisputed facts contained within the record suf-
    ficient to conclusively determine whether counsel did or did
    - 65 -
    Nebraska Court of A ppeals A dvance Sheets
    26 Nebraska A ppellate R eports
    STATE v. ST. CYR
    Cite as 
    26 Neb. Ct. App. 61
    not provide effective assistance and whether the defendant
    was or was not prejudiced by counsel’s alleged deficient per-
    formance? 
    Id. V. ANALYSIS
                          1. Excessive Sentence
    (a) Length of Incarceration
    St. Cyr assigns the district court erred by sentencing him to
    40 to 50 years’ imprisonment, instead of a lesser term of incar-
    ceration. St. Cyr was convicted of first degree assault pursuant
    to § 28-308, which is a Class II felony. Under Neb. Rev. Stat.
    § 28-105 (Reissue 2016), a Class II felony is punishable by 1
    to 50 years’ imprisonment. St. Cyr’s sentence was therefore
    within the statutory limits.
    [4-6] Where a sentence imposed within the statutory limits
    is alleged on appeal to be excessive, the appellate court must
    determine whether the sentencing court abused its discretion
    in considering and applying the relevant factors as well as any
    applicable legal principles in determining the sentence to be
    imposed. State v. Stone, 
    298 Neb. 53
    , 
    902 N.W.2d 197
    (2017).
    When imposing a sentence, the sentencing judge should con-
    sider the defendant’s (1) age, (2) mentality, (3) education and
    experience, (4) social and cultural background, (5) past crimi-
    nal record or record of law-abiding conduct, and (6) motivation
    for the offense, as well as (7) the nature of the offense and (8)
    the violence involved in the commission of the offense. See 
    id. The appropriateness
    of a sentence is necessarily a subjective
    judgment and includes the sentencing judge’s observation of
    the defendant’s demeanor and attitude and all the facts and cir-
    cumstances surrounding the defendant’s life. State v. Chacon,
    
    296 Neb. 203
    , 
    894 N.W.2d 238
    (2017).
    St. Cyr was 32 years old at the time of sentencing. He was
    single and had no dependents. He has a high school diploma
    and reportedly attended one semester of college. St. Cyr’s
    employment history is “inconsistent due to being in and out
    of incarceration.” He reports that both of his parents suffered
    - 66 -
    Nebraska Court of A ppeals A dvance Sheets
    26 Nebraska A ppellate R eports
    STATE v. ST. CYR
    Cite as 
    26 Neb. Ct. App. 61
    from addiction to alcohol in the past, but that his father had
    been sober for 10 to 15 years and his mother had been sober
    for 20 years. All of his siblings have suffered from addiction
    to alcohol in the past, but they were all sober at the time of
    his presentence investigation. St. Cyr first consumed alcohol
    at age 11 and reported regular use by age 14. He indicated he
    attended substance abuse treatment and relapsed in 2015 or
    2016, and he said that each of his convictions originally began
    with the use of alcohol. He “described a desire to consume
    alcohol in the future because he feels hopeless.” He also uses
    marijuana and peyote. St. Cyr “recalled being traumatized by
    a combination of his parent[s’] alcoholism and growing up in
    Winnebago, which he described as a hostile and violent envi-
    ronment.” He “described how ‘retaliation is rampant on the
    reservation’” and indicated three of his brothers have “been
    injured due to retaliatory assaults”—one of his brothers suf-
    fered a gunshot wound to the face, one was started on fire, and
    another has been beaten and stabbed. He reported being the
    victim of violence or abuse on numerous occasions, includ-
    ing being stabbed in the chest twice during fights in 1998 and
    2003. He reported being diagnosed with anxiety and depres-
    sion during his incarceration in federal prison and attempting
    suicide numerous times between the ages of 17 and 21 (since
    then his suicidal thoughts “‘come and go’”). St. Cyr “identi-
    fied his excessive alcohol consumption and poor choice in
    peers as problematic, noting he desires immediate substance
    abuse intervention.”
    St. Cyr’s criminal history includes convictions for posses-
    sion of marijuana (community service and 1 year’s probation);
    attempted robbery (36 months’ probation revoked and subse-
    quently sentenced to 14 to 18 months’ imprisonment); third
    degree assault (365 days’ jail time); and burglary and assault
    with a dangerous weapon resulting in serious injury in “Indian
    Country” (“6 years Bureau of Prisons [and] 3 years supervised
    release”; probation revoked and subsequently sentenced to “12
    months federal prison”).
    - 67 -
    Nebraska Court of A ppeals A dvance Sheets
    26 Nebraska A ppellate R eports
    STATE v. ST. CYR
    Cite as 
    26 Neb. Ct. App. 61
    Regarding his current conviction, St. Cyr told the proba-
    tion officer that he went to a friend’s house in Winnebago,
    Nebraska, and that two other females he did not know were
    there. They were all drinking. The females wanted to go to
    Norfolk, and they all headed that way. On the drive, one of
    the women received telephone calls which became “heated.”
    She told St. Cyr and the others that the caller would often beat
    her up. St. Cyr “felt compelled to offer [himself] as her cham-
    pion” and said he would “‘kick his ass.’” When they arrived in
    Norfolk, they encountered the man, but nothing happened and
    they parted ways. St. Cyr and his group went to a bar and got
    “kicked out” after a bar fight. After St. Cyr and his friend left
    a second bar, a person asked “if [they] were Indians.” St. Cyr
    “became offended and started an argument.” St. Cyr believed
    that the argument had escalated into a fight and that he had
    “made the first move.” He said, “I assaulted a man I never . . .
    knew,” and the man received serious injuries. St. Cyr explained
    that he assaulted the victim in the current matter so severely
    because St. Cyr had been “involved in two past assaults in
    which he allowed the victim to regain consciousness, [and as]
    a result, those individuals came to and retaliated against [him],
    assaulting him severely.” St. Cyr said, “‘This is why I went so
    far’”; “‘I would never have done this if sober.’” The record
    reflects that the victim suffered extensive injuries as a result of
    the assault, including being placed on life support and experi-
    encing a coma; due to the extent of the injuries sustained, the
    victim has been unable to return to employment and has accu-
    mulated a massive amount of medical debt.
    As part of the presentence investigation, the probation officer
    conducted a “Level of Service/Case Management Inventory.”
    St. Cyr was assessed at a “very high risk level for recidivism.”
    The probation officer recommended that St. Cyr be sentenced
    to a term of incarceration.
    At the sentencing hearing, the court noted it had read
    through the facts and St. Cyr’s statement and still did not
    understand what caused the “pretty violent incident.” St. Cyr
    - 68 -
    Nebraska Court of A ppeals A dvance Sheets
    26 Nebraska A ppellate R eports
    STATE v. ST. CYR
    Cite as 
    26 Neb. Ct. App. 61
    said that it was “somewhat motivated by the people [he] was
    with, but still that [wasn’t] cause for such a horrible act to hap-
    pen to another person.” He said, “I already suffer from a lot
    of mental health issues, but when it comes to alcohol, it just
    brings out the worse [sic] in me. So I guess I really don’t have
    really nothing to say to support it or justify it. It was horrible.
    I’m ashamed of it.” He acknowledged that he did not know the
    victim and that the victim did not make movements or threat-
    ening gestures toward him.
    The State called the victim’s brother to testify at the sen-
    tencing hearing. The brother testified that the victim was “life-
    flighted” to a medical center, was given a “30-percent chance
    of living,” and “was hooked to every machine available, even
    for breathing, feeding tubes. Numerous IV’s.” The brother tes-
    tified that the victim
    experienced a very heavy head injury, brain trauma. They
    were even talking about doing surgery and putting in
    drains and everything else due to the swelling on his
    brain. He had a fractured skull across his left side. His
    nose was broke[n]. It was pretty extensive, where they
    were so worried about the vertebrae in his neck that they
    left the collar on for an extended period of time.
    They didn’t even try attempting to back off the breath-
    ing machine for approximately ten days. He was in basi-
    cally a medically-induced coma just to see if he would
    even breathe on his own again.
    The victim “had no vision at that time” and had broken ribs.
    Because of the brain injury, he has short-term memory loss
    and did not even recognize his mother. He was in the hospital
    for “[a]bout a month.” The victim (25 years old at the time of
    St. Cyr’s sentencing hearing) was self-employed as a contrac-
    tor and has no insurance, and his Medicaid was denied, so they
    could not get him the recovery therapy he needed at any reha-
    bilitation facilities.
    The State also played “actual video from behind the bar”
    from an outside camera (which video does not appear in our
    record).
    - 69 -
    Nebraska Court of A ppeals A dvance Sheets
    26 Nebraska A ppellate R eports
    STATE v. ST. CYR
    Cite as 
    26 Neb. Ct. App. 61
    The State asked for a “significant amount of incarceration.”
    St. Cyr’s counsel noted his client’s background and said “it
    doesn’t justify anything,” but “[i]t just explains an unfortunate
    convergence of everything that was brought in where he was
    that night.” And St. Cyr apologized to the victim’s family on
    the record.
    The court said, “I don’t know if I’ve ever seen anybody
    beaten this bad before.” The court further said:
    [W]atching that video was pretty shocking. . . . I don’t
    know if I’ve ever seen anything like that before and I
    don’t think I ever want to. It’s just a brutal attack. . . .
    [C]learly this victim was unconscious. When you contin-
    ued to kick and stomp at his head and, you know, that’s
    just something I just don’t understand. . . .
    . . . It seemed to me, at least from what I understand
    from the police reports and from watching the video and
    the comments that have been made, that this was pretty
    much non-provoked. . . .
    You may not have killed this victim . . . but you
    definitely have altered his life in a very negative way
    and who knows whether he will fully recover ever from
    these injuries.
    The court found that St. Cyr was not a qualified candidate for
    probation and that there was a substantial likelihood of his
    reoffending in a similar manner. The court determined that
    “the most effective recourse” was incarceration and sentenced
    him to 40 to 50 years’ imprisonment.
    In his brief, St. Cyr argues that the district court “did not
    properly consider [his] rehabilitative needs in light of his back-
    ground, his acknowledgment of responsibility, and his willing-
    ness to enter a plea of guilty, saving the State the expense of
    and the victim the trauma of trial.” Brief for appellant at 14.
    He argued a reduced sentence would have been more appropri-
    ate. However, upon our review of the record and consideration
    of the relevant sentencing factors in this case, we find the
    district court did not abuse its discretion in the length of the
    prison sentence ordered.
    - 70 -
    Nebraska Court of A ppeals A dvance Sheets
    26 Nebraska A ppellate R eports
    STATE v. ST. CYR
    Cite as 
    26 Neb. Ct. App. 61
    (b) Restitution
    St. Cyr argues that the district court erred in ordering
    him to pay restitution in the amount of $100,000, without
    conducting a meaningful examination of his ability to pay
    that amount. The State asserts, “While no one objected to
    the imposition of restitution even when it was imposed, . . .
    actions which would ordinarily waive the argument on appeal,
    it is still plain error since the imposition of restitution did not
    comply with state statutes.” Brief for appellee at 13. Plain
    error may be found on appeal when an error unasserted or
    uncomplained of at trial, but plainly evident from the record,
    prejudicially affects a litigant’s substantial right and, if uncor-
    rected, would result in damage to the integrity, reputation, and
    fairness of the judicial process. State v. Kidder, 
    299 Neb. 232
    ,
    
    908 N.W.2d 1
    (2018).
    [7] A sentencing court may order the defendant to make
    restitution for the actual physical injury or property damage
    or loss sustained by the victim as a direct result of the offense
    for which the defendant has been convicted. Neb. Rev. Stat.
    § 29-2280 (Reissue 2016). Section 29-2280 vests trial courts
    with the authority to order restitution for actual damages sus-
    tained by the victim of a crime for which the defendant is con-
    victed. State v. Ramirez, 
    285 Neb. 203
    , 
    825 N.W.2d 801
    (2013).
    According to Neb. Rev. Stat. § 29-2281 (Reissue 2016):
    To determine the amount of restitution, the court may
    hold a hearing at the time of sentencing. The amount
    of restitution shall be based on the actual damages sus-
    tained by the victim and shall be supported by evidence
    which shall become a part of the court record. The court
    shall consider the defendant’s earning ability, employ-
    ment status, financial resources, and family or other legal
    obligations and shall balance such considerations against
    the obligation to the victim. In considering the earning
    ability of a defendant who is sentenced to imprisonment,
    the court may receive evidence of money anticipated to
    be earned by the defendant during incarceration. . . . The
    court may order that restitution be made immediately,
    - 71 -
    Nebraska Court of A ppeals A dvance Sheets
    26 Nebraska A ppellate R eports
    STATE v. ST. CYR
    Cite as 
    26 Neb. Ct. App. 61
    in specified installments, or within a specified period of
    time not to exceed five years after the date of judgment or
    defendant’s final release date from imprisonment, which-
    ever is later.
    Further, if the offense results in bodily injury, the court may
    require payment of necessary medical care, including, but not
    limited to, physical or psychological treatment and therapy, and
    payment for income lost due to such bodily injury. Neb. Rev.
    Stat. § 29-2282 (Reissue 2016).
    [8] After the sentencing court determines that a conviction
    warrants restitution, it then becomes the sentencing court’s
    factfinding responsibility to determine the victim’s actual dam-
    ages and the defendant’s ability to pay. State v. 
    Ramirez, supra
    .
    An evidentiary hearing is required to support a restitution order
    under § 29-2281, and restitution should be based on evidence
    of both actual damages and the defendant’s ability to pay.
    See State v. Holecek, 
    260 Neb. 976
    , 
    621 N.W.2d 100
    (2000).
    Restitution ordered by a court pursuant to § 29-2280 is a crimi-
    nal penalty imposed as a punishment for a crime and is part of
    the criminal sentence imposed by the sentencing court. State v.
    
    Holecek, supra
    .
    The victim’s brother testified at the sentencing hearing. He
    testified about the extent of the victim’s injuries and some of
    the medical costs, saying it was “well over a hundred thou-
    sand.” And the presentence investigation report contains copies
    of the victim’s medical bills that total well over $100,000—his
    medical center bill alone was over $100,000, his “life-flight”
    bill was $59,999, and there were numerous other medical bills
    totaling several thousands of dollars.
    However, as noted by the State, there was no consideration
    by the court of St. Cyr’s ability to pay. In fact, at the sentenc-
    ing hearing, the State indicated St. Cyr “has been incarcerated
    . . . and has no financial means. We’re not officially seeking
    restitution, but the restitution . . . is clearly in the [presen-
    tence investigation report] as to what medical bills are still
    owed.” The court asked St. Cyr if he had any money to pay
    for the medical bills; his response was no. The court then
    - 72 -
    Nebraska Court of A ppeals A dvance Sheets
    26 Nebraska A ppellate R eports
    STATE v. ST. CYR
    Cite as 
    26 Neb. Ct. App. 61
    asked St. Cyr how he thought the bills would get paid, and he
    responded: “[I]f you were to give me the bill for the restitution,
    I would try to do my best to pay it off. Day by day, year by
    year, however it can be done.”
    The district court stated: “I will also order restitution, even
    though I’m sure you won’t ever be able to pay it, but I’m going
    to order it, in the amount of $100,000. Clearly the medical bills
    that I’ve reviewed add up to more than that.” The court did not
    state how restitution of $100,000 would be paid by St. Cyr,
    especially given his lengthy term of incarceration.
    Although the district court considered St. Cyr’s ability to
    pay the restitution from the standpoint that the court con-
    cluded St. Cyr “won’t ever be able to pay it,” the court did
    not state when and how the restitution was to be paid or
    whether it was to be paid immediately, in installments, or
    within a specified period of time. In light of the applicable
    law, we find plain error and must vacate the restitution por-
    tion of St. Cyr’s sentence, remanding the cause back to the
    trial court for proceedings that are consistent with this opin-
    ion and the statutory factors set forth in § 29-2281. See State
    v. Mick, 
    19 Neb. Ct. App. 521
    , 
    808 N.W.2d 663
    (2012) (finding
    record did not indicate trial court meaningfully considered
    factors mandated by § 29-2281 with respect to defendant’s
    ability to pay restitution; trial court’s order regarding restitu-
    tion vacated and cause remanded to trial court for proceedings
    consistent with appellate opinion and statutory factors set
    forth in § 29-2281).
    2. Effectiveness of Counsel
    [9] When a defendant’s trial counsel is different from his
    or her counsel on direct appeal, the defendant must raise on
    direct appeal any issue of trial counsel’s ineffective perform­
    ance which is known to the defendant or is apparent from the
    record. Otherwise, the issue will be procedurally barred. State
    v. Casares, 
    291 Neb. 150
    , 
    864 N.W.2d 667
    (2015).
    The fact that an ineffective assistance of counsel claim is
    raised on direct appeal does not necessarily mean that it can
    - 73 -
    Nebraska Court of A ppeals A dvance Sheets
    26 Nebraska A ppellate R eports
    STATE v. ST. CYR
    Cite as 
    26 Neb. Ct. App. 61
    be resolved. State v. Loding, 
    296 Neb. 670
    , 
    895 N.W.2d 669
    (2017). The determining factor is whether the record is suf-
    ficient to adequately review the question. 
    Id. [10-12] To
    prevail on a claim of ineffective assistance of
    counsel under Strickland v. Washington, 
    466 U.S. 668
    , 104 S.
    Ct. 2052, 
    80 L. Ed. 2d 674
    (1984), the defendant must show
    that counsel’s performance was deficient and that this deficient
    performance actually prejudiced his or her defense. State v.
    Sellers, 
    279 Neb. 220
    , 
    777 N.W.2d 779
    (2010). To show preju-
    dice when the alleged ineffective assistance relates to the entry
    of a plea, the defendant must show that there is a reasonable
    probability that, but for counsel’s errors, he or she would not
    have entered the plea and would have insisted on going to trial.
    State v. Fester, 
    287 Neb. 40
    , 
    840 N.W.2d 543
    (2013). The two
    prongs of this test, deficient performance and prejudice, may
    be addressed in either order. 
    Id. St. Cyr
    contends that his trial counsel was ineffective
    because counsel “failed to utilize all means available to place
    mitigating evidence before the sentencing court, prior to sen-
    tencing.” Brief for appellant at 22. More specifically, he argues
    counsel could have offered letters of support for St. Cyr as
    mitigating evidence. He also argues that counsel could have
    motioned the court to utilize “the evaluations authorized in
    §§29-2261 or 29-2204.03.” Brief for appellant at 25. St. Cyr
    claims, “It is conceivable that had trial counsel done so,” then
    “a more appropriate sentence would have been imposed.” Brief
    for appellant at 25 and 26.
    Neb. Rev. Stat. § 29-2261(5) (Reissue 2016) states that
    before imposing sentence, the court may order the offender to
    submit to psychiatric observation and examination for a period
    not exceeding 60 days or such longer period as the court deter-
    mines to be necessary for that purpose. And Neb. Rev. Stat.
    § 29-2204.03(1) (Reissue 2016) states:
    When the court is of the opinion that imprisonment may
    be appropriate but desires more detailed information as
    a basis for determining the sentence to be imposed than
    - 74 -
    Nebraska Court of A ppeals A dvance Sheets
    26 Nebraska A ppellate R eports
    STATE v. ST. CYR
    Cite as 
    26 Neb. Ct. App. 61
    has been provided by the presentence report required by
    section 29-2261, the court shall commit an offender to
    the Department of Correctional Services for a period not
    exceeding ninety days. The department shall conduct a
    complete study of the offender during that time, inquiring
    into such matters as his or her previous delinquency or
    criminal experience, social background, capabilities, and
    mental, emotional, and physical health and the rehabilita-
    tive resources or programs which may be available to suit
    his or her needs.
    [13] Both §§ 29-2261 and 29-2204.03 give the court the
    discretion to order further evaluations of the defendant prior to
    sentencing when it deems such evaluations necessary for deter-
    mining the sentence to be imposed; neither statute provides
    that a defendant can or should request the evaluations. Trial
    counsel cannot be deficient for failing to request evaluations
    that the court itself could have ordered, but in its discretion
    deemed unnecessary.
    Furthermore, St. Cyr does not say who would have provided
    letters of support (or what information those letters would have
    contained). See, generally, State v. Abdullah, 
    289 Neb. 123
    ,
    133, 
    853 N.W.2d 858
    , 867 (2014) (showing witnesses whom
    defendant advised counsel would have been “‘beneficial’”
    to defendant’s case at trial raises potential issues of deficient
    performance and prejudice; but vague assertion referring to
    “‘at least two’” witnesses seems little more than placeholder;
    “[w]ithout such specific allegations, the postconviction court
    would effectively be asked to ‘“conduct a discovery hearing
    to determine if anywhere in this wide world there is some evi-
    dence favorable to defendant’s position”’”).
    St. Cyr does not say what other information his attorney
    should have presented to provide “a more complete picture”
    of St. Cyr. Brief for appellant at 25. In his brief, he mentions
    that he was the product of dysfunction and violence, that he
    had post-traumatic stress disorder, and that alcohol contributed
    to the events. However, St. Cyr himself provided all of this
    - 75 -
    Nebraska Court of A ppeals A dvance Sheets
    26 Nebraska A ppellate R eports
    STATE v. ST. CYR
    Cite as 
    26 Neb. Ct. App. 61
    information during the presentence investigation, and the court
    considered that information. We cannot say that St. Cyr’s trial
    counsel was deficient. But even if trial counsel was deficient,
    St. Cyr cannot establish prejudice based on his counsel’s fail-
    ure to offer mitigating factors. The court read the presentence
    investigation report which, as set forth previously in this
    opinion, went into great detail about St. Cyr’s background and
    the struggles he had encountered. Even in light of this infor-
    mation, the sentence imposed was not excessive, as we have
    concluded. The result of the proceeding would not have been
    different had counsel offered additional information regarding
    St. Cyr’s social background, capabilities, rehabilitative needs,
    and mental, emotional, and physical health. Considering the
    circumstances of the offense, St. Cyr’s criminal history, and his
    history of alcohol abuse, argument from counsel or other infor-
    mation reiterating the same background factors that St. Cyr
    himself provided would not have resulted in a lesser sentence.
    Because St. Cyr cannot show prejudice, his claim of ineffective
    assistance of counsel fails.
    VI. CONCLUSION
    We affirm the district court’s sentencing order imposing 40
    to 50 years’ imprisonment; however, the restitution portion of
    the sentence is vacated, and the cause is remanded for pro-
    ceedings consistent with this opinion.
    A ffirmed in part, sentence of restitution vacated,
    and cause remanded with directions.