Rogers v. Nichols ( 2023 )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA MICHAEL ROGERS, Plaintiff, 8:23CV443 VS. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER JUSTIN NICHOLS, Sheriff; and DUNDY COUNTY SHERIFF DEPT, Defendants. Plaintiff Michael Rogers, a non-prisoner,' filed a Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis. Filing No. 2. Upon review of Plaintiff's Motion, the Court finds that Plaintiff is financially eligible to proceed in forma pauperis. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted, and the Complaint shall be filed without payment of fees. Plaintiff is advised that the next step in his case will be for the Court to conduct an initial review of his claims to determine whether summary dismissal is appropriate under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2). The Court will conduct this initial review in its normal course of business. Dated this 17th day of October, 2023. BY THE COURT: Joseph F. Bataillon Senior United States District Judge ' Plaintiffs Complaint, Filing No. 1, indicates he is a civilly committed detainee. Thus, Plaintiff is not a “prisoner” within the meaning of the PLRA. See Reed v. Clarke, No. 4:04CV3168, 2005 WL 1075092, at *1 n.1 (D. Neb. May 5, 2005) ("The plaintiff is presently in the Lincoln Regional Center pursuant to a mental health commitment. The Prison Litigation Reform Act (‘PLRA’) does not apply to persons in custody pursuant to the Mental Health Commitment Act, as the definition of ‘prisoner’ in the PLRA does not include a person involuntarily committed for reasons of mental health.”) (citing Kolocotronis v. Morgan, 247 F.3d 726, 728 (8th Cir.2001)).