Zacarias-Lopez (Elder) v. State ( 2014 )


Menu:
  •                 Moreover, appellant's petition was successive because he had previously
    filed two post-conviction petitions for a writ of habeas corpus, and it
    constituted an abuse of the writ as he raised claims new and different
    from those raised in his previous petitions. 3 See NRS 34.810(1)(b)(2); NRS
    34.810(2). Appellant's petition was procedurally barred absent a
    demonstration of good cause and actual prejudice.       See NRS 34.726(1);
    NRS 34.810(1)(b); NRS 34.810(3). Moreover, because the State specifically
    pleaded ladies, appellant was required to overcome the rebuttable
    presumption of prejudice. NRS 34.800(2).
    Appellant did not provide a good cause argument. To the
    extent that he argued that the procedural bars did not apply because he
    was challenging the constitutionality of the laws and the jurisdiction of
    the courts, appellant's argument was without merit. Appellant's claims
    challenged the validity of his judgment of conviction, and thus, the
    procedural bars do apply in this case. 4 See NRS 34.720(1); NRS 34.724(1).
    Because appellant did not demonstrate good cause, the petition was
    procedurally barred. Further, appellant failed to overcome the
    3 Zacarias-Lopezv. State, Docket No. 44802 (Order of Affirmance,
    June 14, 2005); Zacarias-Lopez v. State, Docket No. 54427 (Order of
    Affirmance, September 10, 2010).
    4Appellant's  claims did not implicate the jurisdiction of the courts.
    Nev. Const. art. 6, § 6; NRS 171.010. We note that the Statutes of Nevada
    contain the laws with the enacting clauses required by the constitution.
    The Nevada Revised Statutes simply reproduce those laws as classified,
    codified, and annotated by the Legislative Counsel. NRS 220.120.
    SUPREME COURT
    OF
    NEVADA
    2
    (0) 1947A e
    presumption of prejudice to the State. Therefore, we conclude that the
    district court did not err in denying the petition, and we
    ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED.
    J.
    Pickering                                   Saitta
    cc:   Hon. Jessie Elizabeth Walsh, District Judge
    Elder Zacarias-Lopez
    Attorney General/Carson City
    Clark County District Attorney
    Eighth District Court Clerk
    SUPREME COURT
    OF
    NEVADA                                                 3
    (0) L941P    GlikP
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 66088

Filed Date: 12/11/2014

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 4/17/2021