Looper (Dujuan) v. State ( 2014 )

 suspect evidence or was improperly influenced by emotion. Looper's
consecutive prison terms of 96-240 months, 19-60 months, and 19-72
months, fall within the parameters provided by the relevant statutes, NRS
193.330(1)(a)(1); NRS 200.366(3)(c); NRS 200.485(2); NRS 200.730(1), and
Looper has not demonstrated that these statutes are unconstitutional. See
Chavez v. State, 125 Nev. 328, 347-48, 213 P.3d 476, 489-90 (2009). The
sentence imposed is not so disproportionate to the gravity of the offenses
as to shock the conscience, see CuIverson v. State, 95 Nev. 433, 435, 596
P.2d 220, 221-22 (1979); see also Harmelin v. Michigan, 501 U.S. 957,
1000-01 (1991) (plurality opinion). We conclude that the district court did
not abuse its discretion, see Parrish v. State, 116 Nev. 982, 988-89, 12 P.3d
953, 957 (2000), and we
ORDER the judgment of conviction AFFIRMED.'
, C.J.
Gibbon's
J.
Pickering
1 Looper's fast track statement does not comply with the formatting
requirements of NRAP 3C(h)(1) and NRAP 32(a)(4)-(5) because it does not
have one-inch margins on all sides and contains a footnote which is not in
the same size font as the text of the brief. We caution counsel that future
failure to comply with the applicable rules when filing briefs in this court
may result in the imposition of sanctions. See NRAP 3C(n).
SUPREME COURT
OF
NEVADA
2
(0) 1947A )312TN.
cc: Hon. Elissa F. Cadish, District Judge
Patti, Sgro & Lewis
Attorney General/Carson City
Clark County District Attorney
Eighth District Court Clerk
SUPREME COURT
OF
NEVADA 3
(0) 1947A e