Garmong v. Dist. Ct. (Wespac) ( 2014 )

 relief is warranted. Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 228,
88 P.3d 840, 844 (2004).
Having considered the parties' arguments and the documents
before us, we conclude that petitioner has not met his burden of
demonstrating that the district court either had a legal duty to deny the
motion to compel arbitration or arbitrarily or capriciously abused its
discretion or exceeded its jurisdiction by granting the motion. See id. We
therefore deny the petition. See Smith, 107 Nev. at 677, 818 P.2d at 851.
It is so ORDERED.
C.J.
J.
J.
Saitta
cc: Hon. Brent T. Adams, District Judge
Carl M. Hebert
Sinai Schroeder Mooney Boetsch Bradley & Pace
Washoe District Court Clerk
SUPREME COURT
OF
NEVADA
2
(0) 19474 ew