-
REVERSE the order granting the motion to dismiss AND REMAND this matter to the district court for further proceedings consistent with this order. J. Hardesty CHERRY, J., concurring: For the reasons stated in the SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC v. U.S. Bank, N.A., 130 Nev. ,
334 P.3d 408(2014), dissent, I disagree that the holder of the first security interest lost its lien priority by virtue of the homeowners association's nonjudicial foreclosure sale. I recognize, however, that SFR Investments is now the controlling law and, thusly, concur in the disposition of this appeal. Iny J. cc: Hon. David B. Barker, District Judge Maier Gutierrez Ayon, PLLC Akerman LLP/Las Vegas Eighth District Court Clerk SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 2 (0) 1947A e
Document Info
Docket Number: 64871
Filed Date: 12/16/2014
Precedential Status: Non-Precedential
Modified Date: 4/18/2021