Russell v. Pappas ( 2014 )

petition in Docket No. 66961 does not articulate a basis for relief, we are not persuaded by his argument in Docket No. 66848 that his constitutional rights were violated by being required to attend the status conference in person.' Accordingly, we deny the writ petition in Docket No. 66961. It is so ORDERED. I J. Hardesty J. J. cc: Hon. Connie J. Steinheimer, District Judge Russell Demetras & O'Neill Washoe District Court Clerk 'Russell's writ petition in Docket No. 66961 also appears to take issue with the district court's decision to not strike a document filed by the defendant. A review of the November 7, 2014, order, however, reveals no discussion or ruling on such an issue. Accordingly, we decline to further consider that issue. See NRAP 21(a)(4) (requiring the petitioner to provide this court with the documentation necessary to understand the matters set forth in the writ petition). SUPREME COURT OF 2 NEVADA (0) 1947A