Davis (Keonis) v. Warden ( 2022 )


Menu:
  •                           IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
    KEONIS LAMONT DAVIS,                                     No. 82583
    Appellant,
    vs.
    WILLIAM A. GITTERE, WARDEN,
    Respondent.                                              FILE            „
    ORDER OF REVERSAL AND REMAND
    This is a pro se appeal from a district court order denying a
    postconviction petition for a writ of habeas corpus. Eighth 133 Nev. 75
    , 77, 
    391 P.3d 760
    , 762
    (2017).
    The factors in NRS 34.750 favored the appointment of counsel.
    Davis filed a motion to proceed in forma pauperis and supporting documents
    alleging he was indigent and requested the assistance of postconviction
    counsel. Davis is serving a significant sentence of 44 years to life. And some
    of Davis's claims require development of facts outside the record, including
    whether trial counsel was ineffective for not investigating or adequately
    challenging the identification of Davis as the shooter. The failure to appoint
    postconviction counsel prevented meaningful litigation of the petition under
    these facts. Furthermore, although the record reflects that Davis filed a
    timely first postconviction petition, the district court's order states that he
    had filed five prior petitions making the instant petition appropriate for
    summary dismissal as successive and procedurally barred. The district
    court also denied Davis's request for postconviction counsel, in part, because
    his filing of a sixth petition without the assistance of counsel demonstrated
    that he could comprehend the proceedings. This confusion over the
    procedural status of the case is problematic as it is unclear to what extent
    it affected the adjudication of Davis's petition and the denial of his request
    'The State repeats this assertion in its answer to Davis's informal
    brief but did not provide any citation to the record or identify any prior
    petitions in support.
    2
    for the appointment of postconviction counsel. For the reasons set forth
    above, we
    ORDER the judgment of the district court REVERSED AND
    REMAND this matter to the district court for proceedings consistent with
    this order.2
    •
    P   liallurkek.SICIru'r€J.
    Parraguirre
    , J.
    Cadish
    cc:   Hon. Michelle Leavitt, District Judge
    Keonis Lamont Davis
    Attorney General/Carson City
    Clark County District Attorney
    Eighth District Court Clerk
    2The  Honorable Mark Gibbons, Senior Justice, participated in the
    decision of this matter under a general order of assignment.
    3
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 82583

Filed Date: 4/29/2022

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 5/3/2022