Supnick v. Supnick (Child Custody) ( 2022 )


Menu:
  • Supreme Court
    OF
    NevADA
    Wn 947A oR
    IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
    MATTHEW ADAM SUPNICK, No. 85212
    Appellant, E L om 5
    vs. Pe
    MELISSA ANN SUPNICK, i
    Respondent. NOV 28 202¢
    ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL
    This is an appeal from an order denying a motion to modify
    child custody. Eighth Judicial District Court, Family Court Division, Clark
    County; Stacy Michelle Rocheleau, Judge.
    This court’s initial review indicated a potential jurisdictional
    defect. Specifically, the notice of appeal appears to have been prematurely
    filed because it was filed after the timely filing of a tolling motion and before
    the motion has been formally resolved. A timely tolling motion terminates
    the 30-day appeal period, and a notice of appeal is of no effect if it is filed
    after such a motion is filed but before the district court enters a written
    order finally resolving the motion. See NRAP 4(a)(6). Accordingly, this
    court entered an order directing appellant to show cause why this appeal
    should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.
    In response to the order to show cause, appellant admits that
    he filed a timely tolling motion for reconsideration and to alter or amend
    the judgment. Appellant contends that the district court’s October 31, 2022,
    minute order denying the tolling motion gives this court jurisdiction over
    this appeal. “[{D]ispositional court orders that are not administrative in
    nature, but deal with the procedural posture or merits of the underlying
    controversy, must be written, signed, and filed before they become
    22- SPIMO
    Supreme Court
    OF
    NeEvADA
    th OSTA 120 Nev. 445
    , 454, 
    92 P.3d 1239
    , 1245 (2004); see also Rust v. Clark
    Cty. Sch. Dist., 
    103 Nev. 686
    , 689, 
    747 P.2d 1380
    , 1382 (1987) (stating that
    the clerk’s minute order is ineffective). Accordingly, it appears the tolling
    motion is still pending. A premature notice of appeal does not divest the
    district court of jurisdiction; this court lacks jurisdiction, and
    ORDERS this appeal DISMISSED.!
    2
    Cadish
    Prekor wep di
    Pickering
    Sr. J.
    ce: Hon. Stacy Michelle Rocheleau, District Judge, Family Court Division
    Jones & LoBello
    Kainen Law Group
    Eighth District Court Clerk
    1The Honorable Mark Gibbons, Senior Justice, participated in this
    matter under a general order of assignment.
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 85212

Filed Date: 11/28/2022

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 11/29/2022