Fed. Housing Fin. Agency v. Westland Liberty Vill., Llc ( 2022 )


Menu:
  •                        IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
    FEDERAL IHOUSÏNG FINANCE                              No. 83695
    AGENCY, IN ITS CAPACITY AS
    CONSERVATOR FOR THE FEDERAL
    NATIONAL MORTGAGE
    ASSOCIATION; AND FEDERAL
    NATIONAL MORTGAGE
    ASSOCIATION,                                                OCT 1 7 2022
    Appellants,                                                        A. BROWN
    CLE       'UPREME COURT
    VS.
    WESTLAND LIBERTY VILLAGE, LLC,                                    CLERK
    A NEVADA LIMITED LIABILITY
    COMPANY; AND WESTLAND
    VILLAGE SQUARE, LLC, A NEVADA
    LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY,
    Respondents.
    ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL
    This is an appeal from a district court order denying a motion
    to dissolve a preliminary injunction. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark
    County; Mark R. Denton, Judge.
    The district court issued a preliminary injunction in the
    underlying dispute between Federal National Mortgage Association
    (Fannie Mae) and Westland Liberty Village, LLC, and Westland Village
    Square, LLC. Federal Housing :Finance Agency (FHFA), in its capacity as
    conservator for Fannie Mae, moved to intervene in the matter. The district
    court allowed F.H.FA to intervene, and FHFA, joined by Fannie Mae, moved
    to dissolve the preliminary injunction, arguing that it violated 
    12 U.S.C. § 4617
    (f). The district court denied the motion to dissolve the preliminary
    injunction., and FH.FA and Fannie Mae appeal that decision.
    SUPREME COURT
    OF
    NEVADA
    (01   1947A
    2-2.-32-01
    This court recently reversed the underlying preliminary
    injunction in Federal National Mortgage Association v. Westland Liberty
    Village, LLC, 138 Nev., Adv. Op. 57,       P.3d        (2022). Given that the
    preliminary injunction was reversed during the pendency of this appeal,
    this appeal, which challenges the district court's order denying FHFA's
    motion to dissolve the preliminary injunction, is now moot. See Univ. &
    Crnty. Coll. Sys. of Nev. v. Nevadans for Sound Gov't, 
    120 Nev. 712
    , 720, 
    100 P.3d 179
    , 186 (2004) (recognizing that In]ormally, a controversy must be
    live through all stages of the proceeding" for judicial review and that a
    matter may become moot through subsequent events); see also Personhood
    Nev. v. Bristol, 
    126 Nev. 599
    , 
    245 P.3d 572
    (2010) (dismissing an appeal as
    moot because this court could not grant effective relief). Accordingly, we
    ORDER this appeal DISMISSED.'
    Parraguirre
    Aa.t                                                              J.
    Hardesty                                  Stiglich
    , J.                                        , J.
    Pickering
    ikr°12"2."Im'aa
    Herndon
    '4': J
    'The Honorable Abbi Silver having retired, this matter was decided
    by a six-justice court.
    SUPREME COURT
    OF
    NEVADA
    2
    101 1947A
    cc:   Hon. Mark R. Denton, District Judge
    Stephen E. Haberfeld, Settlement Judge
    Snell & Wilmer, LLP/Las Vegas
    Fennemore Craig P.C./Reno
    Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLP/Washington DC
    Snell & Wilmer, LIT/Reno
    Dickinson Wright PLLC
    Cooper & :Kirk PLLC/Washington DC
    Campbell & Williams
    Law Offices of John Benedict
    John W. Hofsaess
    Eighth District Court Clerk
    SUPREME COURT
    OF
    NEVADA
    3
    (01 1947A    410.4D
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 83695

Filed Date: 10/17/2022

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/18/2022