Alexander v. New York Community Bancorp, Inc. ( 2013 )


Menu:
  • the light most favorable to the plaintiff. Buzz Stew, LLC v. City of N. Las
    Vegas, 
    124 Nev. 224
    , 228, 
    181 P.3d 670
    , 672 (2008). We are not required,
    however, "to accept legal conclusions cast in the form of factual allegations
    if those conclusions cannot reasonably be drawn from the facts alleged."
    Cholla Ready Mix, Inc. v. Civish, 
    382 F.3d 969
    , 973 (9th Cir. 2004).
    Here, appellant's complaint provided no factual support for
    her legal conclusion that her debt to NYCB had been discharged—i.e., that
    her debt had been "set-off. . . pursuant to public policy." We have
    thoroughly reviewed appellant's proper person appeal statement and the
    record on appeal and are unable to discern any facts that would support
    appellant's stance. To the contrary, the documents submitted by
    respondents along with their motion to dismiss demonstrate that
    appellant's debt was not discharged and that NYCB holds valid title to the
    subject property.   Cf. Breliant v. Preferred Equities Corp., 
    109 Nev. 842
    ,
    847, 
    858 P.2d 1258
    , 1261 (1993) (indicating that publicly recorded
    documents may be considered in ruling on a motion to dismiss).
    Thus, we conclude that the district court properly dismissed
    appellant's complaint. NRCP 12(b)(5). We have considered appellant's
    other allegations of error and conclude that these allegations do not
    warrant reversal of the district court's order. Accordingly, we
    ORDER the judgmeat of the district court AFFIRMED.
    Gibbons
    . J.
    Douglas                                    Saitta
    2
    cc:   Hon. Ronald J. Israel, District Judge
    Kelly Innsbruck Alexander
    Pite Duncan, LLP
    Eighth District Court Clerk
    SUPREME COURT
    OF
    NEVADA
    (0) 1947A