-
the light most favorable to the plaintiff. Buzz Stew, LLC v. City of N. Las Vegas,
124 Nev. 224, 228,
181 P.3d 670, 672 (2008). We are not required, however, "to accept legal conclusions cast in the form of factual allegations if those conclusions cannot reasonably be drawn from the facts alleged." Cholla Ready Mix, Inc. v. Civish,
382 F.3d 969, 973 (9th Cir. 2004). Here, appellant's complaint provided no factual support for her legal conclusion that her debt to NYCB had been discharged—i.e., that her debt had been "set-off. . . pursuant to public policy." We have thoroughly reviewed appellant's proper person appeal statement and the record on appeal and are unable to discern any facts that would support appellant's stance. To the contrary, the documents submitted by respondents along with their motion to dismiss demonstrate that appellant's debt was not discharged and that NYCB holds valid title to the subject property. Cf. Breliant v. Preferred Equities Corp.,
109 Nev. 842, 847,
858 P.2d 1258, 1261 (1993) (indicating that publicly recorded documents may be considered in ruling on a motion to dismiss). Thus, we conclude that the district court properly dismissed appellant's complaint. NRCP 12(b)(5). We have considered appellant's other allegations of error and conclude that these allegations do not warrant reversal of the district court's order. Accordingly, we ORDER the judgmeat of the district court AFFIRMED. Gibbons . J. Douglas Saitta 2 cc: Hon. Ronald J. Israel, District Judge Kelly Innsbruck Alexander Pite Duncan, LLP Eighth District Court Clerk SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA (0) 1947A
Document Info
Docket Number: 60592
Filed Date: 9/20/2013
Precedential Status: Non-Precedential
Modified Date: 10/30/2014