Lopez (Israel) v. State ( 2013 )

 laches, appellant failed to demonstrate that his plea was invalid. See
State v. Freese, 116 Nev. 1097, 1105, 13 P.3d 442, 448 (2000); Bryant v.
State, 102 Nev. 268, 271, 721 P.2d 364, 367 (1986). Appellant was
informed of the possibility of restitution in the written plea agreement,
and he affirmed during the plea canvass that he had read and understood
the plea agreement. Therefore, the district court did not err in denying
this portion of the motion.
Appellant also claimed that the amount of restitution was
incorrect and that the restitution was imposed in an improper manner. To
the extent that appellant sought to correct his sentence on this basis, he
failed to demonstrate that his sentence was facially illegal. See Edwards
v. State, 112 Nev. 704, 708, 918 P.2d 321, 324 (1996). Therefore, the
district court did not err in denying this portion of the motion.
Having concluded that appellant is not entitled to relief, we
ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED.
Gibbons
Douglas
J.
Saitta
cc: Hon. Jerome T. Tao, District Judge
Israel Lopez
Attorney General/Carson City
Clark County District Attorney
SUPREME COURT Eighth District Court Clerk
OF
NEVADA
2
(0) 1947A
YIVEME T-MtlISSEMINEMONSIMINIIMIENHEREM
-'