in Re: Parental Rights as to J.H., B.H., C.H., M.H., S.H. and R.H. ( 2013 )


Menu:
  •                                The district court further found that appellant abandoned the
    children and failed to maintain any contact with the children after he was
    aware that they were in protective custody.    See NRS 128.012. Moreover,
    the court found that appellant is incarcerated in the State of Oklahoma for
    arson, and that prior to his incarceration, he failed to complete any case
    plan on earlier petitions where the children were found to be in need of
    protection. See NRS 128.0126; NRS 128.106(6); In re Parental Rights as to
    K.D.L., 
    118 Nev. 737
    , 747-48, 
    58 P.3d 181
    , 187-88 (2002). Finally, the
    district court found that the children have been placed with familiar foster
    parents, who wish to adopt them. See NRS 128.108. Having reviewed the
    record, we conclude that the district court's decision to terminate
    appellant's parental rights is supported by substantial evidence.      In re
    Parental Rights as to D.R.H., 
    120 Nev. 422
    , 428, 
    92 P.3d 1230
    , 1234
    (2004). Accordingly, we
    ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED.
    Parraguirre
    SUPREME COURT
    OF
    NEVADA
    2
    (0) 1947A
    IIMEMEREMI
    cc: Hon. Cheryl B. Moss, District Judge, Family Court Division
    Jerry H.
    Legal Aid Center of Southern Nevada
    Clark County District Attorney
    Clark County District Attorney/Juvenile Division
    Eighth District Court Clerk
    SUPREME COURT
    OF
    NEVADA
    (0) 1947A
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 61188

Filed Date: 7/24/2013

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 4/18/2021