MacKie v. Dist. Ct. (La Pelusa) ( 2013 )

 will not issue when the petitioners have a plain, speedy, and adequate
remedy at law, NRS 34.170; NRS 34.330, and we have consistently held
that an appeal is generally an adequate legal remedy precluding writ
relief. Pan u. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 224, 88 P.3d 840,
841 (2004).
Having considered the petition and appendix, we conclude
that our intervention by way of extraordinary relief is not warranted.
NRAP 21(b)(1); Smith, 107 Nev. at 677, 818 P.2d at 851. Specifically,
petitioners have an adequate legal remedy in the form of an appeal from
any adverse final judgment. Pan, 120 Nev. at 224, 88 P.3d at 841.
Accordingly, we
ORDER the petition DENIED.
Saitta
cc: Hon. Susan Johnson, District Judge
Hansen Rasmussen, LLC
Cottle Law Firm
Eighth District Court Clerk
SUPREME COURT
OF
NEVADA
2
(0) 1947A