North v. Higgins ( 2014 )

 writ of mandamus in the district court. As the challenged order had
already expired before appellant sought to challenge it, the district court
did not abuse its discretion in finding that appellant's petition for writ
relief was untimely. See Personhood Nevada v. Bristol, 126 Nev. ,
245 P.M 572, 574 (2010) (stating that a controversy must be present
through all stages of the proceeding). Accordingly, we
ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED. 1
J.
Pickering
1,1
L arragtre
J.
Saitta
cc: Hon. Connie J. Steinheimer, District Judge
Kenneth A. North
Attorney General/Carson City
Washoe County District Attorney Richard A. Gammick
Washoe District Court Clerk
'The Office of the Attorney General filed a notice indicating that the
Attorney General is not the official attorney responsible for the defense of
any named party in this appeal. It appears that the Office of the Attorney
General was improperly listed as an attorney for respondents.
Accordingly, we direct the clerk of this court to remove the Office of the
Attorney General as the attorney of record for respondents and add
Washoe County District Attorney Richard A. Gammick as the attorney for
respondents.
SUPREME COURT
OF
NEVADA
2
(0) 1947A