Weinstein v. Montenay ( 2013 )

 "random,' fortuitous; [and] 'attenuated' contact" that is insufficient to
establish specific personal jurisdiction over respondent. 2 Western Heritage
Thrift & Loan v. Cloutier, 107 Nev. 471, 473, 813 P.2d 999, 1000 (1991)
(quoting Burger King, 471 U.S. at 475). Accordingly, we
ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED.
Hardesty
Parraguirre
J.
rune
cc: Hon. Rob Bare, District Judge
Morris Paul Weinstein
Ballard Spahr Andrews & Ingersoll, LLP
Eighth District Court Clerk
...continued
Western Heritage Thrift & Loan v. Cloutier, 107 Nev. 471, 473, 813 P.2d
999, 1000 (1991) (indicating that personal jurisdiction cannot be based on
fortuitous contact with the forum state).
Nor does the fact that appellant lived in Nevada while he managed
2
the parties' other non-Nevada-based entities establish general personal
jurisdiction over respondent. Trump v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 109
Nev. 687, 699, 857 P.2d 740, 748 (1993) (indicating that general
jurisdiction is properly exercised when the defendant's contacts with the
forum state "are so substantial or continuous and systematic that [the
defendant] may be deemed present in the forum" (quotation omitted)).
SUPREME COURT
OF
NEVADA
2
(0) I947A
Kled