Polk v. Dist. Ct. (State) ( 2013 )

 107 Nev. 674, 677, 818 P.2d 849, 851 (1991). It is within our discretion to
determine if a writ petition will be considered. Smith, 107 Nev. at 677,
818 P.2d at 851. Petitioner bears the burden of demonstrating that
extraordinary relief is warranted. Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120
Nev. 222, 228, 88 P.3d 840, 844 (2004).
Having considered both the petition and the amended
petition,' we conclude that petitioner has failed to demonstrate that
extraordinary relief is warranted. See Pan, 120 Nev. at 228, 88 P.3d at
844. Thus, we deny the petition. See NRAP 21(b)(1); Smith, 107 Nev. at
677, 818 P.2d at 851.
It is so ORDERED.
iLt
Hardesty
Parraguirre
Cherry
cc: Renard Truman Polk
Attorney General/Carson City
Eighth District Court Clerk
Pershing County Clerk
'We direct the clerk of this court to file the amended petition,
provisionally received in this court on August 1, 2013.
SUPREME COURT
OF
NEVADA
2
(0) 1947A