Silva (David) v. State ( 2013 )

 State, 112 Nev. 472, 475, 915 P.2d 282, 284 (1996) (internal quotation
marks omitted); see also Harmelin v. Michigan, 501 U.S. 957, 1000-01
(1991) (plurality opinion).
Appellant does not allege that the district court relied on
impalpable or highly suspect evidence or that the relevant statutes are
unconstitutional, and his sentence is within the parameters of the
applicable statutes. See NRS 200.366, NRS 201.230, NRS 193.330.
Appellant admitted to sexually molesting a child, and his sentence is not
so disproportionate to his criminal acts as to shock the conscience.
Therefore, we conclude that the imposed sentences do not constitute cruel
and unusual punishment and the district court did not abuse its
discretion. Accordingly, we
ORDER the judgment of conviction AFFIRMED.
Hardesty
Parraguirre
cc: Hon. Elissa F. Cadish, District Judge
Clark County Public Defender
Attorney General/Carson City
Clark County District Attorney
Eighth District Court Clerk
SUPREME COURT
OF
NEVADA
2
(0) 1947A
REaliVE IM , htM