Does 1-24 v. Dist. Ct. (Attorney General) ( 2016 )

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
DOES 1-24, INDIVIDUALS, No. 64890
Petitioners,
vs.
THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT
COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA,
IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF FILED
CLARK; AND THE HONORABLE
DOUGLAS SMITH, DISTRICT JUDGE, JAN 2 2 2016
Respondents, TRACE K. UNDEMAN
CLERK r SUPREME COURT
and BY
DEPUTY CLERK
CATHERINE CORTEZ MASTO,
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE
OF NEVADA; JAMES WRIGHT,
DIRECTOR OF THE NEVADA
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY;
BERNARD W. CURTIS, CHIEF OF THE
PAROLE AND PROBATION DIVISION
OF THE NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF
PUBLIC SAFETY; JULIE BUTLER,
DIVISION ADMINISTRATOR OF THE
RECORDS AND TECHNOLOGY
DIVISION OF THE NEVADA
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY;
DOUGLAS GILLESPIE, SHERIFF OF
THE LAS VEGAS METROPOLITAN
POLICE DEPARTMENT; PATRICK E.
MOERS, POLICE CHIEF OF THE
HENDERSON POLICE DEPARTMENT;
STEVEN WOLFSON, CLARK COUNTY
DISTRICT ATTORNEY, AND MICHAEL
SEGELSTEIN, AN INDIVIDUAL,
Real Parties in Interest.
SUPREME COURT
OF
NEVADA
10) I q4 7A
1 47 -02 2 61 1
ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS OR
PROHIBITION
This is an original petition for a writ of mandamus or
prohibition challenging the implementation of A.B. 579, which establishes
new classification, registration, and reporting requirements for sex
offenders. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Douglas Smith,
Judge.
In seeking relief from the district court's denial of their
application for a temporary restraining order to enjoin the implementation
of A.B. 579, petitioners challenge the constitutionality of A.B. 579.
Having considered the petition, we are not persuaded that
writ relief is warranted. See NRS 34.160; NRS 34.320; see also Pan u.
Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 228, 88 P.3d 840, 844 (2004)
("Petitioners carry the burden of demonstrating that extraordinary relief
is warranted."). Further, we note that because the district court order at
issue is the denial of an application for a temporary restraining order, the
record below is not sufficiently developed for judicial review. See Pan, 120
Nev. at 229, 88 P.3d at 844.
SUPREME COURT
OF
NEVADA
Accordingly, we ORDER the petition DENIED.
e.“...N-
Parraguirre
—L-tit.tia\ J.
Hardesty
FA'3 J.
Douglas
Gibbons
SUPREME COURT
OF
NEVADA
3
(0) 1947A et.
cc: Hon. Douglas Smith, District Judge
McLetchie Shell LLC
Robert L. Langford & Associates
Frank J. Cremen
Henderson City Attorney
Attorney General/Transportation Division/Las Vegas
Marquis Aurbach Coffing
Clark County District Attorney/Civil Division
Eighth District Court Clerk
SUPREME COURT
OF
NEVADA
4
(0) 1947A