Cvitonavich (Aaron) v. Dist. Ct. (State) ( 2015 )

 purely legal issues, see Ostman v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 107 Nev.
563, 565, 816 P.2d 458, 459-60 (1991); State v. Babayan,, 106 Nev. 155,
174, 787 P.2d 805, 819-20 (1990).'
It is so ORDERED.
Gibbons
CC: Hon. Douglas Smith, District Judge
Legal Resource Group
Attorney General/Carson City
Clark County District Attorney
Eighth District Court Clerk
'Petitioner argues that the district applied the incorrect legal
standard in reviewing his pretrial habeas petition. Because he has not
shown that the district court manifestly abused its discretion in this
regard, no relief is warranted. See State v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court
(Armstrong), 127 Nev., Adv. Op. 84, 267 P.3d 777, 780 (2011) (defining
manifest abuse and arbitrary or capricious exercise of discretion).
SUPREME COURT
OF
NEVADA
2
(0) 1947A e,
uNNIBtiel,A