Vahey v. Mara Enter.'s ( 2016 )


Menu:
  •                          IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
    JAMES W. VAHEY, INDIVIDUALLY;                         No. 69340
    AND OTHER HAND, LLC, A NEVADA
    LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY,
    Appellants,                              FILED
    vs.
    MARA ENTERPRISES, A CALIFORNIA
    JAN 2 6 2016
    CORPORATION,                                              TRACE K. UNDEMAN
    CLERK OF SUPREME COURT
    Respondent.                         BY
    DEPUTY
    ORDER GRANTING MOTION AND DISMISSING APPEAL
    This is an appeal from a district court's findings of fact,
    conclusions of law, and judgment in a real property action. Eighth
    Judicial District Court, Clark County; Kathleen E. Delaney, Judge.
    Respondent has filed a motion to dismiss this appeal for lack
    of jurisdiction, asserting that the notice of appeal is premature because
    claims asserted in a third-party complaint remain pending below.
    Appellants oppose the motion and respondent has filed a reply. In their
    opposition, appellants concede that this is an appeal from an interlocutory
    order, but they contend that the order is appealable pursuant to NRAP
    3A(b)(3), (5), (9), and (10).
    NRAP 3A(b)(5) allows for an appeal from an order dissolving
    or refusing to dissolve an attachment. This rule does not apply to the
    instant appeal as the order appealed from expunges a lis pendens, not an
    attachment. Likewise, neither NRAP 3A(b)(9) or (10) apply to this appeal
    as the order appealed from neither directs an accounting nor directs a
    partition, sale, or division of property.
    NRAP 3A(b)(3) allows for an appeal from an order dissolving
    an injunction. The order appealed from does dissolve a preliminary
    SUPREME COURT
    OF
    NEVADA
    (01 1)47A   ce
    go-0210 344
    injunction. However, that fact alone does not give this court jurisdiction
    over all of the other issues addressed in the order appealed from, and
    addressing this singular issue would conflict with this court's policy to
    avoid piecemeal appellate review.      See Bally's Grand Hotel & Casino v.
    Reeves, 
    112 Nev. 1487
    , 1488, 
    929 P.2d 936
    , 937 (1996).
    Because claims remain pending below and no NRCP 54(b)
    certification was obtained, this appeal is premature.      Lee v. GNLV Corp.,
    
    116 Nev. 424
    , 
    996 P.2d 416
    (2000); KDI Sylvan Pools v. Workman,             
    107 Nev. 340
    , 
    810 P.2d 1217
    (1991); Rae v. All American Life & Gas.         Co., 
    95 Nev. 920
    , 
    605 P.2d 196
    (1979). Accordingly, we conclude that we lack
    jurisdiction over this appeal, and we grant respondent's motion to dismiss
    and dismiss this appeal. This dismissal is without prejudice to appellants'
    right to file an appeal from a district court order properly certified as final
    under NRCP 54(b), or from a true final judgment.
    It is so ORDERED
    Douglas
    1."7"Xe         J.
    Chsz(7
    ,
    Cherry
    cc: Hon. Kathleen E. Delaney, District Judge
    Thomas J. Tanksley, Settlement Judge
    Black & LoBello
    Kolesar & Leatham, Chtd.
    Eighth District Court Clerk
    SUPREME COURT
    OF
    NEVADA
    (0) 1947A    ea,                                          2