-
Therefore, we conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion by denying the motion. See Crawford, 117 Nev. at 721, 30 P.3d at 1125. 1 Next, appellant contends that the district court abused its discretion at sentencing, resulting in a cruel and unusual sentence, because he turned himself in for the crime, indicated remorse, and sought to better himself in prison. 2 We disagree. Regardless of its severity, a sentence within the statutory limits is not 'cruel and unusual punishment unless the statute fixing punishment is unconstitutional or the sentence is so unreasonably disproportionate to the offense as to shock the conscience." Blume v. State,
112 Nev. 472, 475,
915 P.2d 282, 284 (1996) (quoting Culverson v. State,
95 Nev. 433, 435,
596 P.2d 220, 221-22 (1979)); see also Harmelin v. Michigan,
501 U.S. 957, 1000-01 (1991) (plurality opinion) (explaining that Eighth Amendment does not require strict proportionality between crime and sentence; it forbids only an extreme sentence that is grossly disproportionate to the crime). Here, the sentence imposed is within the parameters provided by the relevant statutes, see NRS 193.165; NRS 200.030(4)(b), and appellant does not allege that those statutes are unconstitutional. Moreover, the sentence is not grossly disproportionate to the crime. Accordingly to appellant, he cheated on his girlfriend and she left him. When she returned the next 'We reject appellant's contention that we should consider claims disavowed by counsel at the evidentiary hearing. We note that appellant did not testify at the evidentiary hearing and therefore cannot demonstrate that his plea was involuntary. 2Appellant was sentenced to life imprisonment without the possibility of parole and a consecutive term of 8 to 20 years' incarceration. SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 2 (0) 1947A 7e4,4 M day to apologize, appellant mercilessly beat her with a belt. The victim told appellant she could not breathe and appellant told her he did not care. The victim died as a result of internal injuries she sustained in the beating. Therefore, we conclude that no relief is warranted on this claim. Having considered appellant's contentions and concluded that they lack merit, we ORDER the judgment of conviction AFFIRMED. Gibbons J. Pickering cc: Hon. James M. Bixler, District Judge Law Office of Kristina Wildeveld Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 3 (0) 1947A e
Document Info
Docket Number: 66276
Filed Date: 12/18/2015
Precedential Status: Non-Precedential
Modified Date: 12/21/2015