Berry (Edward) v. Dist. Ct. (State) ( 2015 )

An unpublis ed order shall not be regarded as precedent and shall not be cited as legal authority. SCR 123 SUPREME COURT or NEVADA {0) 1947A W IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA N0. 6912'? HLED DEC l 7 N15 EDWARD WARDELL BERRY,’ Petitioner, ' VS. - THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, H IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF I CIMK, Respondent, and, THE STATE OF NEVADA, : Real Part in Interest. ORDER DENYING PE TI TI 0N Thisls a pro se petitian for a writ of mandamus. Petitianer seeks a writ campelling the district court to I reverse its denial of We have reviewed. the dncuments submitted in this matter, and Without deciding upon :themerits 0f any claims raised therein, we» decline tn exercise Uriginal jurisdictinn in this »matter. SeaNRS 34.160; NBS 34.170. Accordingly, we ORDER the petition DENIED. I b Saitta q_ “1‘ ,Jd Pickering cc: Edward Wardell Berry Gregory & Waldo Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attmrney Eighth District Court Clerk | E pew presentence motion to withdraw guilty plea. I l y