Hensley (Michael) v. Laxalt ( 2015 )

An unpublis ed order shall not be regarded as precedent and shall not be cited as legal authority. SCR 123 I IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA MICHAEL E. HENSLEY, ND. 69109 Petitioner, 7 VS. ADAAM P. LAXALT, ATTORNEY GENERAL, Res :- ondent. ORDER DENYING PETITION This is a pm 86 petition for a writ of mandamus. Petitioner seeks an order directing that he be considered for parole pursuant to the legislative changes set Earth in AB. 267. See All. 287, ?8th Leg. (Nev. 2015). We halve reviewed the documents submitted in this matter, and without deciding upon the merits of any claims raised therein, we decline to exercise— criginal jurisdiction in thie matter. See NBS 34.160; NR8 34.170. This issue should be presented to the district court in the first instance where a factual record may be made. Accordingly, we ORDER the petition DENIED. (1%) , J. Gibbcns Pickering cc: Michael E. Hensley Attorney GeneralfCarson City SUPREME COURT ‘m 16 - gg‘nj