Fonseca v. Miszlay ( 2015 )

 against Jeff Miszlay. See Lee v. GNLV, Corp., 116 Nev. 424, 996 P.2d 416(2000). Third, it appeared that because the district court order
contemplated that appellant may be permitted to file a second amended
complaint, the order may not be final and appealable under NRAP 3A(b).
See, Bergenfield v. BAC Home Loans Servicing, LP, 131 Nev. Adv. Op. 68,
354 P.3d 1282, 1284 (2015).
Appellant has filed two responses, neither of which addresses
these jurisdictional concerns. Because appellant has not identified any
district court order that resolves the identified outstanding claims, we
conclude that the summary judgment order is interlocutory and not
appealable under NRAP 3A(b)(1). Even if the order resolved all pending
claims, it would still not be appealable under NRAP 3A(b) where appellant
fails to demonstrate, or even argue, that the appeal is not moot or that the
district court's order constitutes a final judgment in light of this court's
opinion in Bergenfield . Accordingly we conclude that we lack jurisdiction
over this appeal, and
ORDER this appeal DISMISSED.
Gibbons
SUPREME COURT
OF
NEVADA
(O1 I94Th et.
2
cc: Hon. Susan Scann, District Judge
Salvatore C. Gugino, Settlement Judge
Law Offices of Eric R. Blank
Rogers, Mastrangelo, Carvalho & Mitchell, Ltd.
Eighth District Court Clerk
SUPREME COURT
OF
NEVADA
3
(0} I947A e