Kreidel (Michael) v. State ( 2016 )


Menu:
  •                        IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
    MICHAEL WAYNE KREIDEL,                                  No. 69407
    Appellant,
    vs.
    THE STATE OF NEVADA,                                         FILED
    Respondent.
    MAR 0 4 2016
    TRACE K ORDEN/AN
    CLERK   F SUPREME COURT
    By
    DE
    DEPUTY CLERK
    ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL
    This is a pro se appeal from a district court order denying a
    motion to vacate judgment. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County;
    Carolyn Ellsworth, Judge.
    This court's preliminary review of this appeal revealed a
    potential jurisdictional defect. Specifically, the district court entered the
    order denying appellant's motion to vacate judgment on November 4,
    2015. Appellant's notice of appeal was due on December 4, 2015.                See
    NRAP 4(b); Edwards v. State, 
    112 Nev. 704
    , 
    918 P.2d 321
     (1996).
    Appellant's notice of appeal, however, was not filed in the district court
    until December 11, 2015, seven days beyond the relevant appeal period.
    "[Nu untimely notice of appeal fails to vest jurisdiction in this court."
    Lozada v. State, 
    110 Nev. 349
    , 352, 
    871 P.2d 944
    , 946 (1994).
    Under this court's holding in             Kellogg v. Journal
    Communications, if appellant delivered his notice of appeal to a prison
    official for mailing on or before December 4, 2015, his notice of appeal
    would be deemed timely filed. 
    108 Nev. 474
    , 477, 
    835 P.2d 12
    , 13 (1992)
    (holding that a notice of appeal is deemed "filed" when it is delivered to a
    prison official). Because appellant signed his notice of appeal on
    December 3, 2015, this court directed the attorney general to obtain and
    SUPREME COURT
    OF
    NEVADA
    (0) 19,0A
    I la -0-7017
    transmit a copy of the notice of appeal. If appellant did not use the notice
    of appeal log, the attorney general was to inform this court whether
    appellant used any other logs. On February 19, 2016, the attorney general
    submitted a timely response. The attorney general indicates that there is
    no record of when appellant mailed his notice of appeal.'
    This court's decision in Kellogg contemplates that the date of
    delivery of the notice of appeal to a prison official will be determined by
    the date recorded in the prison mail log.    Id. at 476-77, 
    835 P.2d at 13
    .
    Here, there is no clear record of the date appellant delivered his notice of
    appeal to a prison official pursuant to Kellogg. Therefore, the December
    11, 2015, filing date of the notice of appeal in the district court controls.
    Because appellant's notice of appeal was untimely filed, we
    ORDER this appeal DISMISSED. 2
    ,   J.
    Hardesty
    J.
    Saitta
    'As noted by the Attorney General in his response, appellant has
    filed a letter in this court indicating that on December 7, 2015, he mailed
    an unknown document to the Eighth Judicial District Court. Regardless
    of what that document might have been, it was still filed outside the time
    period for filing a notice of appeal.
    2 Inlight of this order, the pro se motions filed on February 8, 2016,
    and February 17, 2016, are denied as moot. The clerk of this court shall
    return, unified, the pro se motion for emergency review for a preliminary
    injunction.
    SUPREME COURT
    OF
    NEVADA
    (0) I947A
    2
    cc: Hon. Carolyn Ellsworth, District Judge
    Michael Wayne Kreidel
    Attorney General/Carson City
    Clark County District Attorney
    Eighth District Court Clerk
    SUPREME COURT
    OF
    NEVADA
    (0) 1947A    7   e4                                     3
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 69407

Filed Date: 3/4/2016

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 4/18/2021