Ragland (Brandon) v. State ( 2016 )

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
BRANDON CHRISTOPHER RAGLAND, No. 69589
Appellant,
vs.
THE STATE OF NEVADA,
Respondent.
FILED
MAR 0 4 2016
TRACE K LINDEMAN
CLERK_W SUPREME COURT
\hwt trif1/4-151
ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL DEPUTY CLERK
This is a pro se appeal from a district court order denying a
motion to expose malfeasance. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark
County; William D. Kephart, Judge.
Because no statute or court rule permits an appeal from the
aforementioned decision, we lack jurisdiction. Castillo v. State, 106 Nev.
349, 352, 792 P.2d 1133, 1135 (1990). Accordingly, we
ORDER this appeal DISMISSED. 1
it
Hardesty
tfretAi\
Saitta Pickering
'In light of this order, we deny as moot the pro se motion for leave to
file an opening brief filed on February 9, 2016.
SUPREME COURT
OF
NEVADA
(0) 1947A en4
1(9-0-7040
cc: Hon. William D. Kephart, District Judge
Brandon Christopher Ragland
Attorney General/Carson City
Clark County District Attorney
Eighth District Court Clerk
SUPREME COURT
OF
NEVADA
(0) I94Th
2