Dane v. Dist. Ct. (Geico Gen. ins.co.) ( 2016 )

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
TONY DANE, No. 69850
Petitioner,
vs.
THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT
COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA,
IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF CLARK; FILED
AND THE HONORABLE JOANNA MAR 18 2016
KISHNER, DISTRICT JUDGE,
Respondents,
and
GEICO GENERAL INSURANCE
COMPANY,
Real Party in Interest.
ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS
This original writ petition challenges a district court's delay in
entering an order regarding attorney fees. It appears that the district
court has entered the order that was the subject of petitioner's writ
petition, and thus the writ petition is moot. Personhood Nev. v. Bristol,
126 Nev. 599, 602, 245 P.3d 572, 574 (2010) (noting that this court's duty
is to resolve actual controversies). Accordingly, we
ORDER the petition DENIED.'
/..16..tfretAt; ,j.
Hardesty
' J.
Saitta Pickering
1 Wenote that although the petition was filed as an "emergency,"
petitioner has not demonstrated what irreparable harm would befall him
if the relief he seeks is not given within 14 days. NRAP 21(a)(6); NRAP
SUPREME COURT 27(e).
OF
NEVADA
(0) 1947A
cc: Hon. Joanna Kishner, District Judge
David L. Mann
Georgeson Angaran, Chtd.
Eighth District Court Clerk
SUPREME COURT
OF
NEVADA
2
(0 ) 1947A e,