Mellor v. Mellor (Child Custody) ( 2015 )

 920, 605 P.2d 196 (1979). The district court's written order of January 6,
2015, specifically provides that the matter is continued for further
evidentiary proceedings, based on appellant's express request for the
continuance. The minute order of December 24, 2014, is likewise not final
for the same reasons. See also Rust v. Clark Cnty. Sch. Dist., 103 Nev.
686, 688-89, 747 P.2d 1380, 1381-82 (1987) (explaining that a minute
order is ineffective for any purpose and cannot be appealed, and that a
written order or judgment must be filed before a district court ruling can
be appealed). The notice of appeal is premature under NRAP 4(a) because
the district court has not entered a final written judgment adjudicating all
the rights and liabilities of all the parties. Accordingly, we conclude that
we lack jurisdiction over this appeal and we
ORDER this appeal DISMISSED. 2
J.
Cherry
cc: Hon. Sandra L. Pomrenze, District Judge, Family Court Division
Robert E. Gaston, Settlement Judge
Bourke Law Ltd.
The Law Offices of Patrick Driscoll, LLC
Eighth District Court Clerk
2 Appellant'smotion for late filing of the fast track statement, filed
on May 18, 2015, is denied as moot.
SUPREME COURT
OF
NEVADA 2
(0) 1947A