Bailey v. Clark Co. ( 2015 )

 regarding the lack of findings in the district court's June 4, 2014, order, we
note that the only sanction imposed on appellant was the dismissal of his
complaint. In this regard, we also note that appellant's complaint had
already been dismissed as to all named defendants except Las Vegas
Metropolitan Police Department Forensic Lab and Clark County
Metropolitan Police Committee on Fiscal Affairs. Because the claims
against these defendants were premised on the same nonactionable
allegations that had been previously dismissed with respect to the other
defendants, appellant's argument does not warrant reversal. We therefore
ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED. 2
7
, J.
Pickering
2 0n February 24, 2015, appellant filed two requests for judicial
notice. Because the first request asks that this court take judicial notice of
documents that are already part of the record on appeal, no further action
needs to be taken with respect to this request. Because the second request
asks that this court take judicial notice of documents that were not
presented to the district court, that request is denied. See Carson Ready
Mix, Inc. v. First Nat'l Bank of Nev., 97 Nev. 474, 476-77, 635 P.2d 276,
277 (1981) (noting that this court may only consider matters appearing in
the record on appeal).
SUPREME COURT
OF
NEVADA
2
(0) 1947A e
cc: Hon. Valerie Adair, District Judge
Anthony Dewane Bailey
North Las Vegas City Attorney
Clark County District Attorney
Olson, Cannon, Gormley, Angulo & Stoberski
Eighth District Court Clerk
SUPREME COURT
OF
NEVADA
3
(0) 1947A