Campbell v. the David Lapin Ltd. P'ship ( 2015 )

 124 Nev. 1, 20, 174 P.3d 970, 982 (2008). In the context of unobjected-to
misconduct, the attorney's conduct must rise to plain error to warrant a
new trial; and plain error in this context is an "irreparable and
fundamental error . . . that results in a substantial impairment of justice
or denial of fundamental rights such that, but for the misconduct, the
verdict would have been different." Id. at 19, 174 P.3d at 982. Having
reviewed the briefs and appendices filed in this matter, we conclude that
no such "substantial impairment of justice or denial of fundamental
rights" occurred during voir dire or the closing arguments, and therefore,
the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying Campbell's motion
for a new trial. Accordingly, we
ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED.
P, I
J.
Gibbons
go , J.
Pickering
cc: Hon. Jerry A. Wiese, District Judge
William C. Turner, Settlement Judge
Thomas & Springberg, P.C.
Pyatt Silvestri & Hanlon
Mandelbaum, Ellerton & Associates
Eighth District Court Clerk
SUPREME COURT
OF
NEVADA
2
(0) 1947A e