Zessman (Eric) v. State ( 2014 )

writ of habeas corpus. 2 See NRS 34.810(2)). Therefore, appellant's motion was procedurally barred absent a demonstration of good cause and actual prejudice. See NRS 34.726(1); NRS 34.810(3). Even if appellant could demonstrate cause for the delay, he cannot demonstrate undue prejudice because his underlying claim—that the State never produced an arrest warrant—did not render his guilty plea invalid and did not entitle him to relief. We therefore conclude that the motion was procedurally barred, and we ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED. C.J. Pickering cc: Hon. Michael Villani, District Judge Eric William Zessman Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk 2 Zessmanv. State, Docket No. 42099 (Order of Affirmance, June 4, 2004); Zessman v. State, Docket No. 44453 (Order of Affirmance, June 15, 2005). SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 2 (0) 1947A (exp