Marigomen v. Dist. Ct. (Ichiyasu) ( 2014 )

 warranted. Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 228, 88 P.3d
840, 844 (2004). Moreover, writ relief is available only when there is no
plain, speedy, and adequate remedy in the ordinary course of law. NRS
34.170; NRS 34.330; Int'l Game Tech., 124 Nev. at 197, 179 P.3d at 558.
Generally, an appeal is an adequate legal remedy precluding writ relief.
Pan, 120 Nev. at 224, 88 P.3d at 841.
Having considered the petition, we are not persuaded that our
intervention is warranted at this time. The district court has scheduled
hearings for January 9 and 14, 2015, to consider real party in interest's
petitions alleging petitioner's breach of fiduciaries duties. NRS 164.015(6)
allows an appeal from a district court order resolving a petition over the
internal affairs of a nontestamentary trust. Petitioner has not
demonstrated that this court's intervention by extraordinary relief on an
emergency basis is warranted before the district court has fully considered
the issues below. Accordingly, we deny the petition and the request for a
stay. 1 See NRAP 21(b)(1); Pan, 120 Nev. at 228, 88 P.3d at 844; Smith,
107 Nev. at 677, 818 P.2d at 851.
It is so ORDERED.
J.
Parraguirre Saitta
1 We note that a request for a stay in this court must be presented
through a separate motion under NRAP 27.
SUPREME COURT
OF
NEVADA
2
(0) I947A
CC: Hon. Gloria Sturman, District Judge
Hon. Wesley F. Yamashita, Probate Commissioner
Ghandi Deeter Law Offices
Mary F Chapman
Anthony L. Barney, Ltd.
Sparber Annen Morris & Gabriel
Eighth District Court Clerk
SUPREME COURT
OF 3
NEVADA
(0) 1947A