Leavitt (Cody) v. State C/W 66419 ( 2015 )

 In his petition filed on March 26, 2014, in district court case
number C248756, and his petition filed on March 27, 2014, in district
court case number C233866, appellant asked the district court to order the
Division of Parole and Probation to correct alleged errors in his
presentence investigation report. We conclude that the district court did
not err in denying appellant's petitions because the district court has no
authority to amend a presentence investigation report after sentencing.
See NRS 34.160; Stockmeier v. State, Bd. of Parole Comm'rs, 127 Nev. ,
, 255 P.3d 209, 213-14 (2011). Therefore, we
ORDER the judgments of the district court AFFIRMED. 2
171)
Parraguirre
, J. , J.
Cherry
2 In
light of this disposition, we deny as moot appellant's applications
to proceed in forma pauperis, motions for waiver of page limitations,
motions to appoint counsel, and motions for production of transcripts at
State expense. We have reviewed all documents that appellant has
submitted in proper person to the clerk of this court in these matters, and
we conclude that no relief based upon those submissions is warranted. To
the extent that appellant has attempted to present claims or facts in those
submissions which were not previously presented in the proceedings
below, we have declined to consider them in the first instance.
SUPREME COURT
OF
NEVADA
2
(0) 1947A
cc: Hon. Michael Villani, District Judge
Hon. James M. Bixler, District Judge
Cody C. Leavitt
Attorney General/Carson City
Clark County District Attorney
Eighth District Court Clerk
SUPREME COURT
OF
NEVADA
3
(C) 1947A Mem