Everest Indemnity Ins. Co. v. Dist. Ct. (Reimers) ( 2015 )


Menu:
  •                 107 Nev. at 
    677, 818 P.2d at 851
    , and it is petitioner's burden to
    demonstrate that our extraordinary intervention is warranted.      Pan v.
    Eighth Judicial Din. Court, 
    120 Nev. 222
    , 228, 
    88 P.3d 840
    , 844 (2004).
    Moreover, writ relief is generally available only when there is no plain,
    speedy, and adequate remedy in the ordinary course of law. NRS 34.170;
    NRS 34.330; Int'l Game 
    Tech., 124 Nev. at 197
    , 179 P.3d at 558.
    Having considered the petition, we are not persuaded that our
    intervention is warranted at this time. NRAP 21(b)(1); 
    Pan, 120 Nev. at 228
    , 88 P.3d at 844; Smith, 107 Nev. at 
    677, 818 P.2d at 851
    . Accordingly,
    we
    ORDER the petition DENIED.
    Parraguirre
    Lccp.,            , J.
    Douglas
    cc:   Hon. Janet J. Berry, District Judge
    Thompson, Coe, Cousins & Irons, L.L.P.
    Georgeson Angaran, Chtd.
    Lemons, Grundy & Eisenberg
    Maddox, Segerblom & Canepa, LLP
    Gordon & Rees, LLP
    Leverty & Associates Law, Chtd.
    Washoe District Court Clerk
    SUPREME COURT
    OF
    NEVADA
    2
    (0) 1947A mem
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 67074

Filed Date: 1/15/2015

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 1/16/2015