Lopez (Paul) v. State C/W 66466 ( 2015 )


Menu:
  •                  
    915 P.2d 282
    , 284 (1996) (quoting CuIverson v. State, 
    95 Nev. 433
    , 435, 
    596 P.2d 220
    , 221-22 (1979)); see also Harmelin v. Michigan, 
    501 U.S. 957
    ,
    1000-01 (1991) (plurality opinion) (explaining that Eighth Amendment
    does not require strict proportionality between crime and sentence; it
    forbids only an extreme sentence that is grossly disproportionate to the
    crime). The sentence imposed is within the parameters provided by the
    relevant statutes, see NRS 200.030, and appellant does not allege that
    those statutes are unconstitutional. Considering the nature and
    circumstances of the offense, we are not convinced that the sentence
    imposed is so grossly disproportionate to the crime as to constitute cruel
    and unusual punishment. 1 Moreover, appellant stipulated• to a life
    sentence without the possibility of parole for first-degree murder. He
    cannot now complain that he received the sentence to which he agreed.
    Appellant next requests that we remand his case to the
    district court for an evidentiary hearing to determine the full scope of the
    issues that should be raised on appeal. He asserts that remand is
    necessary because counsel was appointed after sentencing and the
    procedural history of the case sheds no light on the issues he desired this
    court to consider. An evidentiary hearing is not an appropriate remedy to
    ascertain what issues should be raised on appeal.
    'Appellant points out that the Nevada Constitution prohibits
    punishment that is cruel or unusual, see Nev. Const. art 1, § 6, while the
    United States Constitution prohibits punishment that is cruel and
    unusual, see U.S. Const. amend. VIII, and that we should be mindful of
    that distinction. For the reasons above, appellant has not demonstrated
    that his sentence is constitutionally infirm under either constitution.
    SUPREME COURT
    OF
    NEVADA
    2
    (0) 1947A    e
    Having considered appellant's contentions and concluded that
    they lack merit, we
    ORDER the judgment of conviction AFFIRMED.
    Parraguirre
    \Do
    Douglas                                  Cherry
    akLay
    cc:   Hon. Carolyn Ellsworth, District Judge
    Christopher R. Oram
    Attorney General/Carson City
    Clark County District Attorney
    Eighth District Court Clerk
    SUPREME COURT
    OF
    NEVADA
    3
    (0) 1947A    e
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 66466

Filed Date: 9/11/2015

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 4/17/2021