In Re: Discipline of Randolph Goldberg ( 2015 )


Menu:
  •                                 The findings and recommendations of a disciplinary hearing
    panel, though persuasive, are not binding on this court. In re Discipline of
    Stuhff, 
    108 Nev. 629
    , 633, 
    837 P.2d 853
    , 855 (1992). The automatic review
    of a panel decision recommending a suspension is conducted de novo,
    requiring the exercise of independent judgment by this court.   Id.; see SCR
    105(3)(b).
    Based on our review of the record, the suspension
    recommendation is insufficient in relation to Goldberg's admitted conduct.
    Accordingly, we reject the conditional guilty plea agreement and remand
    this matter to the Southern Nevada Disciplinary Board for further
    proceedings.
    It is so ORDERED.
    Hardesty
    Parraguirre
    tfi
    J.
    Saitta
    Gibbons
    cc: Chair, Southern Nevada Disciplinary Board
    Michael J. Warhola, LLC
    Bar Counsel, State Bar of Nevada
    SUPREME COURT
    OF
    NEVADA
    2
    AP 1 ,147A TER#D
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 67422

Filed Date: 9/18/2015

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 4/17/2021