Mitchell (Michael) v. Warden ( 2013 )


Menu:
  •                 review the court's application of the law to those facts de novo.   Lader v.
    Warden, 
    121 Nev. 682
    , 686, 
    120 P.3d 1164
    , 1166 (2005).
    The district court denied these claims because it concluded
    that counsel squarely presented the issue of intent to the jury and a
    voluntary intoxication instruction wasn't warranted under the
    circumstances, and because the evidence against Mitchell, which included
    testimony that he confessed to entering the business with the intent to
    commit a larceny, was overwhelming. The record supports these
    determinations, and we conclude that the district court did not err by
    denying these claims.
    Second, Mitchell contends that the district court erred by
    relying on impalpable and highly suspect evidence at sentencing, resulting
    in a cruel and unusual sentence. Although Mitchell notes that trial
    counsel did not object below and appellate counsel did not raise such on
    appeal, he does not argue that the district court erred by finding that
    counsel were not ineffective. Instead, he argues that this court should
    review his sentence for excessiveness and reasonableness in the first
    instance. We decline to do so. See Davis v. State, 
    107 Nev. 600
    , 606, 
    817 P.2d 1169
    , 1173 (1991) (holding that this court need not consider
    arguments raised on appeal that were not presented to the district court
    in the first instance), overruled on other grounds by Means v. State, 
    120 Nev. 1001
    , 
    103 P.3d 25
     (2004). Even if we were to construe this claim as a
    claim arguing that the district court erred by finding that counsel was not
    ineffective at sentencing, we conclude that it lacks merit because the
    district court did not err by denying the claim.
    SUPREME COURT
    OF
    NEVADA
    2
    (0) 1947A
    Having considered Mitchell's contentions and concluded that
    he is not entitled to relief, we
    ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED.
    ,
    J.
    Gibbons
    J.
    cc: Hon. Patrick Flanagan, District Judge
    Karla K. Butko
    Attorney General/Carson City
    Washoe County District Attorney
    Washoe District Court Clerk
    3
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 62524

Filed Date: 9/19/2013

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 4/17/2021