-
review the court's application of the law to those facts de novo. Lader v. Warden,
121 Nev. 682, 686,
120 P.3d 1164, 1166 (2005). The district court denied these claims because it concluded that counsel squarely presented the issue of intent to the jury and a voluntary intoxication instruction wasn't warranted under the circumstances, and because the evidence against Mitchell, which included testimony that he confessed to entering the business with the intent to commit a larceny, was overwhelming. The record supports these determinations, and we conclude that the district court did not err by denying these claims. Second, Mitchell contends that the district court erred by relying on impalpable and highly suspect evidence at sentencing, resulting in a cruel and unusual sentence. Although Mitchell notes that trial counsel did not object below and appellate counsel did not raise such on appeal, he does not argue that the district court erred by finding that counsel were not ineffective. Instead, he argues that this court should review his sentence for excessiveness and reasonableness in the first instance. We decline to do so. See Davis v. State,
107 Nev. 600, 606,
817 P.2d 1169, 1173 (1991) (holding that this court need not consider arguments raised on appeal that were not presented to the district court in the first instance), overruled on other grounds by Means v. State,
120 Nev. 1001,
103 P.3d 25(2004). Even if we were to construe this claim as a claim arguing that the district court erred by finding that counsel was not ineffective at sentencing, we conclude that it lacks merit because the district court did not err by denying the claim. SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 2 (0) 1947A Having considered Mitchell's contentions and concluded that he is not entitled to relief, we ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED. , J. Gibbons J. cc: Hon. Patrick Flanagan, District Judge Karla K. Butko Attorney General/Carson City Washoe County District Attorney Washoe District Court Clerk 3
Document Info
Docket Number: 62524
Filed Date: 9/19/2013
Precedential Status: Non-Precedential
Modified Date: 4/17/2021