In Re: Discipline of Brian Bloomfield ( 2014 )

 SCR 111(7) states that "[f]or good cause, the court may set
aside its order suspending the attorney from the practice of law."
Bloomfield has filed a combined opposition to the State Bar's petition for
temporary suspension and a countermotion to set aside the suspension.
We conclude that Bloomfield has failed to demonstrate good cause to set
aside the mandatory suspension. SCR 111(7); see In re Discipline of
Trujillo, 24 P.3d 972, 979 (Utah 2001). We refer this matter to the
Southern Nevada Disciplinary Board for the initiation of formal
disciplinary proceedings in which the sole issue to be determined is the
extent of discipline to be imposed. SCR 111(8).
It is so ORDERED.
cc: Jeffrey Albregts, Chair, Southern Nevada Disciplinary Board
David A. Clark, Bar Counsel
Kimberly K. Farmer, Executive Director, State Bar of Nevada
William B. Terry, Chartered
Perry Thompson, Admissions Office, United States Supreme Court
SUPREME COURT
OF
NEVADA
2
(0) 1947A