Joiner, Jr. (Emerson) v. State ( 2014 )

 not under a sentence of death or imprisonment as required by NRS 34.724.
See Coleman v. State, 130 Nev. „ 321 P.3d 863, 867 (2014).
Therefore, because Joiner did not meet the imprisonment requirement of
NRS 34.724, he was not eligible for post-conviction habeas relief. See id.For this reason, we affirm the decision of the district court to deny the
petition. 2 Accordingly, we
ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED. 3
Parraguirre ao-c
J.
Saitta
2Although the district court incorrectly addressed the procedural
bars and merits of the claims, we nevertheless affirm because the district
court reached the correct result in denying the petition. See Wyatt v.
State, 86 Nev. 294, 298, 468 P.2d 338, 341 (1970) (holding that a correct
result will not be reversed simply because it is based on the wrong reason).
3 Joiner's counsel has filed two motions for leave to amend or
supplement the fast track statement and response with recent relevant
authority that supports his claims that his lifetime supervision conditions
are unconstitutional. Because we do not reach the merits of Joiner's
challenges to his sentence of lifetime supervision, we deny the motions to
supplement his fast track statement with authority and argument related
to those issues.
SUPREME COURT
Of
NEVADA
2
(0) 1947A e
cc: Hon. James M. Bixler, District Judge
Turco & Draskovich
Attorney General/Carson City
Clark County District Attorney
Eighth District Court Clerk
SUPREME COURT
OF
NEVADA
3
(0) 1947A