Putnam Leasing Co. I, LLC v. Moran ( 2014 )

 elementary and fundamental requirement of due process in any
proceeding which is to be accorded finality is notice reasonably calculated,
under all the circumstances, to apprise interested parties of the pendency
of the action and afford them an opportunity to present their objections."),
and we therefore affirm the district court's decision to set aside the New
York judgment.' Rosenstein v. Steele, 103 Nev. 571, 573, 747 P.2d 230,
231 (1987) (explaining that a lack of due process is an appropriate basis to
set aside a foreign judgment under the Full Faith and Credit Clause of the
United States Constitution).
It is so ORDERED.
j.
Parraguirre Cherry
'Although the district court's finding that appellant had failed to
make a good-faith effort to work out a payment arrangement with
respondent before commencing the New York action was not a proper
basis for setting aside the judgment, see Rosenstein u. Steele, 103 Nev. 571,
573, 747 P.2d 230, 231 (1987) (explaining that, under the Full Faith and
Credit Clause of the United States Constitution, the courts of this state
may not set aside a final judgment of a sister state "absent a showing of
fraud, lack of due process or lack of jurisdiction in the rendering state"),
we may affirm the judgment of the district court if it reached the right
result, even if it did so for the wrong reason. See Sengel v. IGT, 116 Nev.
565, 570, 2 P.3d 258, 261 (2000).
SUPREME COURT
OF
NEVADA
2
(CD 1947A e
cc: Hon. Douglas Smith, District Judge
Salvatore C. Gugino, Settlement Judge
The Bach Law Firm
Gordon & Rees, LLP
Eighth District Court Clerk
SUPREME COURT
OF
NEVADA
3
(01 1947A 9rfgrk,