Sanchez v. State, Dept. of Corrections ( 2014 )

 that "Whe facts as stated simply do not state a civil rights claim for relief."
We have reviewed appellant's complaint and his reply to the district
court's order directing him to submit points and authorities demonstrating
a factual and legal basis for his claims for relief. Having done so, we agree
with the district court that, based on the facts alleged, appellant failed to
adequately articulate any recognizable causes of action under the
constitutional amendments cited. Jordan v. State ex rel. Dep't of Motor
Vehicles & Pub. Safety, 121 Nev. 44, 57-58, 110 P.3d 30, 41 (2005)
(recognizing that a district court may dismiss a complaint after the
plaintiff has had an opportunity and failed to cure perceived defects in the
complaint), abrogated on other grounds by Buzz Stew, LLC v. City of N.
Las Vegas, 124 Nev. 224, 228 n.6, 181 P.3d 670, 672 n.6 (2008); Buzz Stew,
124 Nev. at 227-28, 181 P.3d at 672 (2008) (recognizing that dismissal of a
complaint is proper when the complaint's factual allegations, even when
recognized as true, do not satisfy the elements of the causes of action being
asserted). Accordingly, we
ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED.
J.
Pcring 141
eashoLjar J.
Parraguirre
Saitta
SUPREME COURT
OF
NEVADA
2
(0) 1947A e
cc: Hon. Steve L. Dobrescu, District Judge
Amadeo J. Sanchez
Attorney General/Carson City
White Pine County Clerk
SUPREME COURT
OF
NEVADA
3
(0) 1947A