Burns (Trevor) v. Dist. Ct. (State) ( 2014 )

 see also State v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court (Armstrong), 127 Nev. ,
267 P.3d 777, 780 (2011) (defining manifest abuse and arbitrary or
capricious exercise of discretion in context of mandamus). It will not issue
if the petitioner has a plain, speedy, and adequate remedy in the ordinary
course of the law. NRS 34.170. "Petitioner[ I carr[ies] the burden of
demonstrating that extraordinary relief is warranted." Pan v. Eighth
Judicial Din. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 228, 88 P.3d 840,844 (2004).
Having considered the petition and its accompanying
documents, we are not satisfied that our intervention by way of
extraordinary writ is warranted. Even assuming that petitioner did not
consent to electronic service pursuant to NRCP 5(b)(2)(D), he has not
shown that he was prejudiced by the manner in which the grand jury
notice was conveyed and therefore he has not demonstrated that the
district court manifestly abused its discretion by denying his habeas
petition. See Lisle v. State, 113 Nev. 540, 551-52, 937 P.2d 473, 480
(1997), clarified on reh'g, 114 Nev. 221, 224-25, 954 P.2d 744, 746-47
(1998); see also Daniels v. State, 114 Nev. 261, 269-70, 956 P.2d 111, 116-
17 (1998) (discussing the adequacy of a grand jury notice). Accordingly,
we
ORDER the petition DENIED.
, J.
SUPREME COURT
OF
NEVADA
2
0) 1947A ce.
cc: Hon. Jessie Elizabeth Walsh, District Judge
Karen A. Connolly, Ltd.
Attorney General/Carson City
Clark County District Attorney
Eighth District Court Clerk
SUPREME COURT
OF
NEVADA
3
(0) I94Th