Greenberg (Jesse) v. State ( 2014 )

34.810(1)(b)(2); NRS 34.810(2). Appellant's petition was procedurally barred absent a demonstration of good cause and actual prejudice. See NRS 34.726(1); NRS 34.810(1)(b); NRS 34.810(3). Moreover, because the State specifically pleaded laches, appellant was required to overcome the rebuttable presumption of prejudice. NRS 34.800(2). In the petition filed below, appellant did not attempt to demonstrate good cause or overcome the presumption of prejudice to the State. Thus, we conclude that the district court did not err in denying appellant's petition as procedurally barred and barred by laches. Accordingly, we ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED. 3 Picigring Parrapig; L J. Saitta 3 We have reviewed all documents that appellant has submitted in proper person to the clerk of this court in this matter, and we conclude that no relief based upon those submissions is warranted. To the extent that appellant has attempted to present claims or facts in those submissions which were not previously presented in the proceedings below, we have declined to consider them in the first instance. SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 2 (0) 1947A e cc: Hon. Valerie Adair, District Judge Jesse B. Greenberg Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 3 (0) 1947A att.