Mullen (Michael) v. State ( 2014 )

 (1987). The prior guilty plea agreement is not invalid merely because
Mullen was not informed that the conviction could be used as an
enhancement in the future, see id. at 274 n.2, 737 P.2d at 1164 n.2, and
there was no detrimental reliance because nothing in that agreement
limited the use of the conviction for enhancement purposes, see Speer v.
State, 116 Nev. 677, 680, 5 P.3d 1063, 1065 (2000). We conclude that the
district court did not err, and we
ORDER the judgment of conviction AFFIRMED.
Pickering
Pitt tup
P J.
Saitta
cc: Hon. Douglas W. Herndon, District Judge
William B. Terry, Chartered
Attorney General/Carson City
Clark County District Attorney
Eighth District Court Clerk
SUPREME COURT
OF
NEVADA
2
(0) I947A en,