Oliver (Terrance) v. State C/W 62031 ( 2013 )

 statutory good time and 150 days for work or study pursuant to NRS
209.4465, and 540 days for participation in programs pursuant to NRS
209.449. Based upon our review of the record on appeal, we conclude that
the district court did not err in denying the petition because appellant
failed to demonstrate that he was entitled to any additional credits and
failed to demonstrate a violation of a constitutional right. See NRS
209.4465; NRS 209.449.
Docket No. 62031
In his motion filed on August 14, 2012, appellant claimed that
he should have received 2,128, rather than 835, days of presentence credit
for time served because that was the amount credited to his concurrent
sentence in a later case. Appellant failed to demonstrate that the district
court relied on mistaken assumptions regarding his criminal record that
worked to his extreme detriment. See Edwards v. State, 112 Nev. 704,
708, 918 P.2d 321, 324 (1996). Appellant also failed to demonstrate that
his sentence was facially illegal or that the district court lacked
jurisdiction. See id. We therefore conclude that the district court did not
err in denying appellant's motion. Accordingly, we
ORDER the judgments of the district court AFFIRMED.
J.
Hardesty
J.
SUPREME COURT
OF
NEVADA
(0) I947A
cc: Hon. David B. Barker, District Judge
Terrance L. Oliver
Attorney General/Las Vegas
Attorney General/Carson City
Clark County District Attorney
Eighth District Court Clerk
SUPREME COURT
OF
NEVADA
3
(0) 1947A